CON Faculty Practice Fund Scoring Rubric
|UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER
COLLEGE OF NURSING
|Faculty Practice Fund Scoring Rubric||Subsection: Appendix Z4|
|Appendix - Appendices||Originating Date: May 2017|
|Responsible Reviewing Agency:
Faculty Practice Committee
|Faculty Practice Fund Scoring Rubric|
|Projects, Conferences or Continuing Education|
plan or design
Not applicable – This item is not relevant to this particular application.
Score of 1 – The application poses a weak explanation for the request. There is little explanation of what the funding request is for or how the outcomes might benefit faculty practice at the UNMC CON.
Score of 2 – The application poses a reasonable explanation for the request. The explanation of the funding request is clear and concise. The outcomes would benefit faculty practice at the UNMC CON.
Score of 3 – The application poses a strong explanation for the request. The explanation of the funding request is clear and concise. Additionally, it includes a strong explanation for significance, innovation, and approach. The outcomes directly benefit faculty practice at the UNMC CON and the individual’s personal trajectory towards promotion and tenure.