CON Student Ratings of Instruction: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "<!-- ************************ MENU TEMPLATE START ******************************************* --> <table style="max-width:70em !important;background:#F8FCFF; text-align:center...") |
(Created page with "<!-- ************************ MENU TEMPLATE START ******************************************* --> <table style="max-width:70em !important;background:#F8FCFF; text-align:center...") |
||
(6 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 40: | Line 40: | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
<td valign="top" width="60%">Responsible Reviewing Agency:<br /><div style="margin-left:3em; line-height:1.2;">Undergraduate Curriculum Committee | <td valign="top" width="60%">Responsible Reviewing Agency:<br /><div style="margin-left:3em; line-height:1.2;">Undergraduate Curriculum Committee<br />Professional Graduate Nursing Affairs Committee<br />PhD Affairs Council | ||
</div></td> | </div></td> | ||
<td valign="top" width="40%"> | <td valign="top" width="40%"> | ||
Line 46: | Line 46: | ||
<table width="100%" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"> | <table width="100%" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
<td>Revised: October 1998<br />Revised: February 2008<br />Revised: [[CON Evaluation of the Courses version March 2011|March 2011]]<br />Reviewed: December 2012</td> | <td>Revised: October 1998<br />Revised: February 2008<br />Revised: [[CON Evaluation of the Courses version March 2011|March 2011]]<br />Reviewed: [[CON Evaluation of the Courses version December 2012|December 2012]]<br />Revised: August 2016 (administrative)</td> | ||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
</table> | </table> | ||
Line 77: | Line 77: | ||
<li style="margin-bottom:15px;">All students have an opportunity to evaluate each course in which they are enrolled.</li> | <li style="margin-bottom:15px;">All students have an opportunity to evaluate each course in which they are enrolled.</li> | ||
<li style="margin-bottom:15px;">Results of summative course evaluation will be provided to faculty, upon completion of course grades.</li> | <li style="margin-bottom:15px;">Results of summative course evaluation will be provided to faculty, upon completion of course grades.</li> | ||
<li style="margin-bottom:15px;">Course evaluation results will also be sent to the appropriate | <li style="margin-bottom:15px;">Course evaluation results will also be sent to the appropriate division assistant dean, to the appropriate program director, to the Associate Dean for Academic Programs, and to the Undergraduate Curriculum Committee or Graduate Affairs Committee or PhD Affairs Council.</li> | ||
.</li> | |||
</ol> | </ol> | ||
<!-- | |||
===General Procedure=== | ===General Procedure=== | ||
<p style="margin-bottom:15px;">J:/Policy/Guidelines-Instructions/UNMC Eval system.</p> | <p style="margin-bottom:15px;">J:/Policy/Guidelines-Instructions/UNMC Eval system.</p> | ||
--> |
Revision as of 15:10, May 18, 2021
Home | Student Policies |
UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER COLLEGE OF NURSING |
||
Evaluation of the Courses | Subsection: 5.1.8 | |
Section 5.0 - Student Policies | Originating Date: January 1992 | |
Responsible Reviewing Agency: Undergraduate Curriculum Committee Professional Graduate Nursing Affairs Committee PhD Affairs Council |
|
Purpose
- The purpose of evaluation of courses is to:
- Provide students an opportunity to give anonymous feedback on what they considered to be strengths and areas for improvement of individual courses.
- Provide means for student input to be included in the evaluation of courses and in the summative and formative evaluation of curriculum.
- Provide faculty with evaluative data for potential course revision.
Policy
- All students have an opportunity to evaluate each course in which they are enrolled.
- Results of summative course evaluation will be provided to faculty, upon completion of course grades.
- Course evaluation results will also be sent to the appropriate division assistant dean, to the appropriate program director, to the Associate Dean for Academic Programs, and to the Undergraduate Curriculum Committee or Graduate Affairs Committee or PhD Affairs Council.