CON Faculty Practice Fund Scoring Rubric

Home

Appendices

UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER COLLEGE OF NURSING
Faculty Practice Fund Scoring Rubric	Subsection: Appendix Z4
Appendix - Appendices	Originating Date: May 2017
Responsible Reviewing Agency: Faculty Practice Committee Executive Council
Referenced documents:

Faculty Practice Fund Scoring Rubric

Applies to

Projects, Conferences or Continuing Education

Scoring Rubric

	Not Applicable	1	2	3
Connection to practice role
Well-developed plan or design
Plans for dissemination

Scoring Explanation

Not applicable – This item is not relevant to this particular application.

Score of 1 – The application poses a weak explanation for the request. There is little explanation of what the funding request is for or how the outcomes might benefit faculty practice at the UNMC CON.

Score of 2 – The application poses a reasonable explanation for the request. The explanation of the funding request is clear and concise. The outcomes would benefit faculty practice at the UNMC CON.

Score of 3 – The application poses a strong explanation for the request. The explanation of the funding request is clear and concise. Additionally, it includes a strong explanation for significance, innovation, and approach. The outcomes directly benefit faculty practice at the UNMC CON and the individual’s personal trajectory towards promotion and tenure.