CON Faculty Practice Fund Scoring Rubric: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 73: Line 73:
</table>
</table>
<br />
<br />
<p style="max-width:70em !important; margin-bottom:15px">Scoring Explanation:</p>
<p style="max-width:70em !important; margin-bottom:15px">'''Scoring Explanation:'''</p>
<p style="max-width:70em !important; margin-bottom:15px">Not applicable – This item is not relevant to this particular application.</p>
<p style="max-width:70em !important; margin-bottom:15px">Not applicable – This item is not relevant to this particular application.</p>
<p style="max-width:70em !important; margin-bottom:15px">Score of 1 – The application poses a '''weak''' explanation for the request.  There is little explanation of what the funding request is for or how the outcomes might benefit faculty practice at the UNMC CON.</p>
<p style="max-width:70em !important; margin-bottom:15px">Score of 1 – The application poses a '''weak''' explanation for the request.  There is little explanation of what the funding request is for or how the outcomes might benefit faculty practice at the UNMC CON.</p>
<p style="max-width:70em !important; margin-bottom:15px">Score of 2 – The application poses a '''reasonable''' explanation for the request.  The explanation of the funding request is clear and concise.  The outcomes would benefit faculty practice at the UNMC CON.</p>
<p style="max-width:70em !important; margin-bottom:15px">Score of 2 – The application poses a '''reasonable''' explanation for the request.  The explanation of the funding request is clear and concise.  The outcomes would benefit faculty practice at the UNMC CON.</p>
<p style="max-width:70em !important; margin-bottom:15px">Score of 3 – The application poses a '''strong''' explanation for the request.  The explanation of the funding request is clear and concise.  Additionally, it includes a strong explanation for significance, innovation, and approach.  The outcomes directly benefit faculty practice at the UNMC CON and the individual’s personal trajectory towards promotion and tenure.</p>
<p style="max-width:70em !important; margin-bottom:15px">Score of 3 – The application poses a '''strong''' explanation for the request.  The explanation of the funding request is clear and concise.  Additionally, it includes a strong explanation for significance, innovation, and approach.  The outcomes directly benefit faculty practice at the UNMC CON and the individual’s personal trajectory towards promotion and tenure.</p>