Difference between revisions of "CON Faculty Practice Fund Scoring Rubric"

From University of Nebraska Medical Center
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 70: Line 70:
 
         <td width="20%" align="center">2</td>
 
         <td width="20%" align="center">2</td>
 
         <td width="20%" align="center">3</td>
 
         <td width="20%" align="center">3</td>
 +
    </tr>
 +
    <tr>
 +
        <td align="right" width="20%">Connection to<br />practice role</td>
 +
        <td align="right" width="20%" align="center">&nbsp;</td>
 +
        <td align="right" width="20%" align="center">&nbsp;</td>
 +
        <td align="right" width="20%" align="center">&nbsp;</td>
 +
        <td align="right" width="20%" align="center">&nbsp;</td>
 +
    </tr>
 +
    <tr>
 +
        <td align="right" width="20%">Well-developed<br />plan or design</td>
 +
        <td align="right" width="20%" align="center">&nbsp;</td>
 +
        <td align="right" width="20%" align="center">&nbsp;</td>
 +
        <td align="right" width="20%" align="center">&nbsp;</td>
 +
        <td align="right" width="20%" align="center">&nbsp;</td>
 +
    </tr>
 +
    <tr>
 +
        <td align="right" width="20%">Plans for<br />dissemination</td>
 +
        <td align="right" width="20%" align="center">&nbsp;</td>
 +
        <td align="right" width="20%" align="center">&nbsp;</td>
 +
        <td align="right" width="20%" align="center">&nbsp;</td>
 +
        <td align="right" width="20%" align="center">&nbsp;</td>
 
     </tr>
 
     </tr>
 
</table>
 
</table>

Revision as of 15:33, May 30, 2017

Home   Appendices                    


UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER
COLLEGE OF NURSING
Faculty Practice Fund Scoring Rubric Subsection: Appendix Z4
Appendix - Appendices Originating Date: May 2017
Responsible Reviewing Agency:
Faculty Practice Committee
Executive Council
 
 


Faculty Practice Fund Scoring Rubric
Applies to:
Projects, Conferences or Continuing Education

Scoring Rubric:


  Not Applicable 1 2 3
Connection to
practice role
       
Well-developed
plan or design
       
Plans for
dissemination
       


Scoring Explanation:

Not applicable – This item is not relevant to this particular application.

Score of 1 – The application poses a weak explanation for the request. There is little explanation of what the funding request is for or how the outcomes might benefit faculty practice at the UNMC CON.

Score of 2 – The application poses a reasonable explanation for the request. The explanation of the funding request is clear and concise. The outcomes would benefit faculty practice at the UNMC CON.

Score of 3 – The application poses a strong explanation for the request. The explanation of the funding request is clear and concise. Additionally, it includes a strong explanation for significance, innovation, and approach. The outcomes directly benefit faculty practice at the UNMC CON and the individual’s personal trajectory towards promotion and tenure.