Difference between revisions of "CON Faculty Practice Fund Scoring Rubric"

From University of Nebraska Medical Center
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 72: Line 72:
 
     </tr>
 
     </tr>
 
     <tr>
 
     <tr>
         <td align="right" width="20%" style="padding: 7px; border-right-style: solid; border-top-style: solid; border-top-color: #0000ff; border-right-color: #0000ff; border-right-width: 1px; border-top-width: 1px; margin-right: 5px;">'''Connection to<br />practice role'''</td>
+
         <td align="right" width="20%" style="padding: 7px; border-right-style: solid; border-top-style: solid; border-top-color: #365F91; border-right-color: #365F91; border-right-width: 1px; border-top-width: 1px; margin-right: 5px;">'''Connection to<br />practice role'''</td>
 
         <td align="right" width="20%" align="center">&nbsp;</td>
 
         <td align="right" width="20%" align="center">&nbsp;</td>
 
         <td align="right" width="20%" align="center">&nbsp;</td>
 
         <td align="right" width="20%" align="center">&nbsp;</td>

Revision as of 15:55, May 30, 2017

Home   Appendices                    


UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER
COLLEGE OF NURSING
Faculty Practice Fund Scoring Rubric Subsection: Appendix Z4
Appendix - Appendices Originating Date: May 2017
Responsible Reviewing Agency:
Faculty Practice Committee
Executive Council
 
 


Faculty Practice Fund Scoring Rubric
Applies to:
Projects, Conferences or Continuing Education

Scoring Rubric:


  Not Applicable 1 2 3
Connection to
practice role
       
Well-developed
plan or design
       
Plans for
dissemination
       


Scoring Explanation:

Not applicable – This item is not relevant to this particular application.

Score of 1 – The application poses a weak explanation for the request. There is little explanation of what the funding request is for or how the outcomes might benefit faculty practice at the UNMC CON.

Score of 2 – The application poses a reasonable explanation for the request. The explanation of the funding request is clear and concise. The outcomes would benefit faculty practice at the UNMC CON.

Score of 3 – The application poses a strong explanation for the request. The explanation of the funding request is clear and concise. Additionally, it includes a strong explanation for significance, innovation, and approach. The outcomes directly benefit faculty practice at the UNMC CON and the individual’s personal trajectory towards promotion and tenure.