9,102
edits
CON Faculty Evaluation: Difference between revisions
→Policy
No edit summary |
(→Policy) |
||
| Line 57: | Line 57: | ||
<br /> | <br /> | ||
===Policy=== | ===Policy=== | ||
<p style="margin-bottom:15px;max-width:70em !important;">The purposes of faculty evaluation are the following:</p> | |||
<ul style="margin-bottom:15px;max-width:70em !important;"> | |||
<li>Review contributions to the tripartite mission: a) teaching, b) scholarship/research and c) service/practice</li> | |||
<li></li> | |||
<li></li> | |||
<li></li> | |||
<li></li> | |||
</ul> | |||
<p style="margin-bottom:15px;max-width:70em !important;">The designated administrators orient newly hired faculty to evaluation policies, procedures and forms at the time of employment.</p> | |||
<p style="margin-bottom:15px;max-width:70em !important;">All faculty are evaluated at least annually by their Division Assistant Dean.</p> | <p style="margin-bottom:15px;max-width:70em !important;">All faculty are evaluated at least annually by their Division Assistant Dean.</p> | ||
<p style="margin-bottom:15px;max-width:70em !important;">Multiple sources of data are used for faculty evaluations. At a minimum, annual evaluations are based on faculty self evaluation, student evaluation, and Division Assistant Dean evaluation. Other data, such as peer evaluation or evaluation by outside consultants, can be sought at the discretion of the Division Assistant Dean and/or the faculty.</p> | <p style="margin-bottom:15px;max-width:70em !important;">Multiple sources of data are used for faculty evaluations. At a minimum, annual evaluations are based on faculty self evaluation, student evaluation, and Division Assistant Dean evaluation. Other data, such as peer evaluation or evaluation by outside consultants, can be sought at the discretion of the Division Assistant Dean and/or the faculty.</p> | ||