CON Student Ratings of Instruction: Difference between revisions

From University of Nebraska Medical Center
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
Line 40: Line 40:
      
      
     <tr>
     <tr>
         <td width="60%">Responsible Reviewing Agency:<br /><div style="margin-left:3em; line-height:1.2;">Undergraduate Curriculum Committee;<br />Graduate Affairs Committee;<br />PhD Affairs Council
         <td width="60%">Responsible Reviewing Agency:<br /><div style="margin-left:3em; line-height:1.2;">Undergraduate Curriculum Committee;<br />Professional Graduate Nursing Program Curriculum Committee;<br />PhD Affairs Council
</div></td>
</div></td>
         <td valign="top" rowspan="2" width="40%">
         <td valign="top" width="40%">
          
          
             <table width="100%" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0">
             <table width="100%" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0">
Line 52: Line 52:
         </td>
         </td>
     </tr>
     </tr>
<!--
     <tr>
     <tr>
     <td><small>LJT:9/08<br />J:/RESOURCE MANUAL/Table of Contents College of Nursing Resource Manual</small></td>
     <td><small>LJT:9/08<br />J:/RESOURCE MANUAL/Table of Contents College of Nursing Resource Manual</small></td>
     </tr>
     </tr>
-->
</table>
</table>



Revision as of 14:01, August 19, 2015

Home   Student Policies                    


UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER
COLLEGE OF NURSING
Evaluation of the Courses Subsection: 5.1.8
Section 5.0 - Students Originating Date: January, 1992
Responsible Reviewing Agency:
Undergraduate Curriculum Committee;
Professional Graduate Nursing Program Curriculum Committee;
PhD Affairs Council
Revised: October, 1998
Revised: February, 2008
Revised: March, 2011
Reviewed: December, 2012


Purpose:

  1. The purpose of evaluation of courses is to:
    1. Provide students an opportunity to give anonymous feedback on what they considered to be strengths and areas for improvement of individual courses.
    2. Provide means for student input to be included in the evaluation of courses and in the summative and formative evaluation of curriculum.
    3. Provide faculty with evaluative data for potential course revision.

Policy:

  1. All students have an opportunity to evaluate each course in which they are enrolled.
  2. Results of summative course evaluation will be provided to faculty, upon completion of course grades.
  3. Course evaluation results will also be sent to the appropriate department chair or division assistant dean, to the appropriate program director, to the Associate Dean for Academic Programs, and to the Undergraduate Curriculum Committee or Graduate Affairs Committee or PhD Affairs Council .

General Procedure:

J:/Policy/Guidelines-Instructions/UNMC Eval system.