CON Student Ratings of Instruction: Difference between revisions

From University of Nebraska Medical Center
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 46: Line 46:
             <table width="100%" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0">
             <table width="100%" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0">
                 <tr>
                 <tr>
                 <td>Revised: October 1998<br />Revised: February 2008<br />Revised: [[CON Evaluation of the Courses version March 2011|March 2011]]<br />Reviewed: [[CON Evaluation of the Courses version December 2012|December 2012]]<br />Revised: August 2016 administrative</td>
                 <td>Revised: October 1998<br />Revised: February 2008<br />Revised: [[CON Evaluation of the Courses version March 2011|March 2011]]<br />Reviewed: [[CON Evaluation of the Courses version December 2012|December 2012]]<br />Revised: August 2016 (administrative)</td>
                 </tr>
                 </tr>
             </table>
             </table>

Revision as of 09:05, August 25, 2016

Home   Student Policies                    


UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER
COLLEGE OF NURSING
Evaluation of the Courses Subsection: 5.1.8
Section 5.0 - Student Policies Originating Date: January 1992
Responsible Reviewing Agency:
Undergraduate Curriculum Committee
Professional Graduate Nursing Affairs Committee
PhD Affairs Council
Revised: October 1998
Revised: February 2008
Revised: March 2011
Reviewed: December 2012
Revised: August 2016 (administrative)


Purpose

  1. The purpose of evaluation of courses is to:
    1. Provide students an opportunity to give anonymous feedback on what they considered to be strengths and areas for improvement of individual courses.
    2. Provide means for student input to be included in the evaluation of courses and in the summative and formative evaluation of curriculum.
    3. Provide faculty with evaluative data for potential course revision.

Policy

  1. All students have an opportunity to evaluate each course in which they are enrolled.
  2. Results of summative course evaluation will be provided to faculty, upon completion of course grades.
  3. Course evaluation results will also be sent to the appropriate department chair or division assistant dean, to the appropriate program director, to the Associate Dean for Academic Programs, and to the Undergraduate Curriculum Committee or Graduate Affairs Committee or PhD Affairs Council .