CON Professional Graduate Nursing Program Grievance Procedure: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "<!-- ************************ MENU TEMPLATE START ******************************************* --> <table style="max-width:70em !important;background:#F8FCFF; text-align:center...")
Line 85: Line 85:
</ol>
</ol>
              
              
====Appeal of the Outcome====
====Grievance Resolution Appeal====
<ol style="max-width:67em !important;">
<ol style="max-width:67em !important;">
             <li style="margin-bottom:15px;">If the evaluation has been judged to be fair and proper, the student may within 10 university days of receiving the ad-hoc committee’s decision, submit a written appeal to the dean setting forth any reasons for challenging the decision of the committee. </li>
             <li style="margin-bottom:15px;">The student and the persons involved under question have the right to file a written appeal to the CON dean within 10 university days of receiving the ad-hoc committee’s decision. </li>
             <li style="margin-bottom:15px;">If the faculty member disagrees with the ad-hoc appeals committee decision, the faculty member may within 10 university days of receiving the ad-hoc committee’s decision, submit a written appeal to the dean setting forth any reasons for challenging the decision of the committee. </li>
             <li style="margin-bottom:15px;">Students who are not satisfied with the dean’s decision have the right to file a written appeal to the UNMC Vice Chancellor for Academic Affairs within 10 university days of receiving the dean’s determination. The student must show: 
             <li style="margin-bottom:15px;">The dean will review the record of the investigation to determine if the appeal procedure has been fair and thorough. The dean may then either affirm the committee decision in whole, in part or not at all. The decision of the dean is final and no further appeal may be made. </li>
            <ul>
                <li> there is evidence that the grievance processes were not followed, and the failure to follow processes resulted in a decision adverse to the student, or  </li>
                <li>there is evidence that their decision was based on an obvious error in interpreting the evidence or applying law and policy, and the error was material to the outcome of the grievance. </li>
               
            </ul>
            </li>
             <li style="margin-bottom:15px;">The Vice Chancellor of Academic Affairs will determine if additional steps are needed to ensure resolution. The determination of the Vice Chancellor of Academic Affairs is final. </li>
</ol>
</ol>
<p style="margin-bottom:15px;max-width:70em !important;"></p>
<p style="margin-bottom:15px;max-width:70em !important;"></p>