CON Requesting Funds from Faculty Practice Fund: Difference between revisions

Line 72: Line 72:


==Process==
==Process==
<p style="max-width:70em !important;">All DEA and APRN certifications will be approved automatically, dependent upon having sufficient funds available. There is no formal application for DEA and APRN certification requests, faculty must submit a detailed receipt within 30 days of obtaining/renewing DEA and APRN certification.</p>
<p style="max-width:70em !important;">Faculty will apply for funds for scholarly projects, dissemination, continuing education, and any other special requests. The External Affairs Committee will review all applications. The External Affairs Committee will determine whether to fund the request and if funded, how much money to award based upon scholarly merit of the project or the contribution the activity will make to furthering faculty practice at the CON and any related discussion. Funding scholarly projects, dissemination, and continuing education is dependent upon having sufficient funds available. Applications to be received on a rolling basis.</p>
<p style="max-width:70em !important;">Faculty will apply for funds for scholarly projects, dissemination, continuing education, and any other special requests. The Faculty Practice Committee of the UNMC College of Nursing will review all applications. The awards will range up to $500. The Faculty Practice Committee will determine whether to fund the request and if funded, how much money to award based upon the scoring rubric and any related discussion. Funding scholarly projects, dissemination, and continuing education is dependent upon having sufficient funds available. Applications to be received on a rolling basis.</p>
<br />
<table style="max-width:70em !important;" width="100%" border="1" cellpadding="5" cellspacing="0" >
    <tr>
          <td colspan="5">'''Scoring Rubric Applied to Scholarly Projects, Dissemination, and Continuing Education Applications'''</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
          <td width="20%">&nbsp;</td>
          <td width="20%">Not Applicable</td>
          <td width="20%">1</td>
          <td width="20%">2</td>
          <td width="20%">3</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
          <td>'''''Connection to practice role'''''</td>
          <td>&nbsp;</td>
          <td>&nbsp;</td>
          <td>&nbsp;</td>
          <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
          <td>'''''Well-developed plan or design'''''</td>
          <td>&nbsp;</td>
          <td>&nbsp;</td>
          <td>&nbsp;</td>
          <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
          <td>'''''Plans for dissemination''''' </td>
          <td>&nbsp;</td>
          <td>&nbsp;</td>
          <td>&nbsp;</td>
          <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
          <td>'''''Promotes UNMC CON'''''</td>
          <td>&nbsp;</td>
          <td>&nbsp;</td>
          <td>&nbsp;</td>
          <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
          <td>'''''Promotes faculty practice'''''</td>
          <td>&nbsp;</td>
          <td>&nbsp;</td>
          <td>&nbsp;</td>
          <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
</table>
<br />
<p style="max-width:70em !important;">Scoring Explanation </p>
<p style="max-width:70em !important;">Not applicable – This item is not relevant to this application.</p>
<p style="max-width:70em !important;">Score of 1 – The application poses a '''weak''' explanation for the request. There is little explanation of what the funding request is for or how the outcomes are beneficial.</p>
<p style="max-width:70em !important;">Score of 2 – The application poses a '''reasonable''' explanation for the request. The explanation of the funding request is clear and concise. The outcomes are moderately beneficial. </p>
<p style="max-width:70em !important;">Score of 3 – The application poses a '''strong''' explanation for the request. The explanation of the funding request is clear and concise. Additionally, it includes a strong explanation for significance, innovation, and approach. The outcomes are very beneficial. </p>