CON Scholarship Guidelines for Doctoral-Prepared Faculty Role Differentiation: Difference between revisions

<p style="margin-bottom:15px;max-width:70em !important;">For faculty with FTE of < .20. Prior to Annual Evaluation with faculty, Mentor (if appropriate), Asst. Dean (or supervisor) and Associate Dean of Research and/or Associate Dean of Practice or Associate Dean of Academics shall meet to negotiate on Scholarship FTE for the following year.</p>

<p style="margin-bottom:15px;max-width:70em !important;">For faculty with FTE > .30.  A meeting every 6 months with faculty, Mentor (if appropriate) , Asst. Dean (or supervisor) and Associate Dean of Research for the first 3 years with this FTE allocation prior to Annual Evaluation of faculty. ADR and Assistant Dean should negotiate on research FTE for the following year.  See table below for proposed Metrics associated with FTE allocation for all doctorally prepared faculty.</p>

====Educator Scholar====

<p style="margin-bottom:15px;max-width:70em !important;">It is anticipated in the role of educator, faculty will have a program of scholarship for knowledge development related to teaching and training programs that contributes to the tripartite mission of the CON. Faculty will disseminate results in publications and presentations. Faculty will want to be recognized for teaching excellence beyond course evaluations, such as in requests for teaching consultation, service on local, regional, national and international boards, recipient of teaching awards, textbook awards, etc. Faculty who are focused on teaching excellence should negotiate substantial time for teaching scholarship, grant funding must be obtained, such as with training grants and funding for teaching innovations. </p>

====Researcher====

<p style="margin-bottom:15px;max-width:70em !important;">It is anticipated that in the role of researcher, faculty will have a research program for knowledge development (efficacy), effectiveness (testing in real world settings) or implementation science (integrated into systems, community etc.) that contributes to the tripartite mission of the CON. Their efforts should be disseminated in publications and presentations which indicate productivity as a researcher. Grant submissions and funding mechanisms must be pursued and is required in order for a faculty who wants to be recognized for research excellence in their faculty role and to negotiate substantial time for research. Research  faculty should be leaders in local, regional, and national arenas with such activities as serving on research boards or councils, journal boards and study sections, councils for professional research organizations.</p>