CON Faculty Member Position Description: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 52: Line 52:


     <tr>
     <tr>
     <td colspan="2" valign="top">Related Documents: <br /><div style="margin-left:3em; line-height:1.2;">[[CON Standards and Guidelines for Promotion and Tenure for Academic Rank|Appendix A1 – Standards and Guidelines for Promotion and Tenure for Academic Rank]]<br />Appendix A1 – Standards and Guidelines for Promotion for Clinical Rank<br />Appendix B1 – Guidelines for Doctorally Prepared Faculty Role Differentiation<br />Policy 4.2.7 – Faculty Evaluation<br />Policy 4.1 – Rules of the Faculty Organization<br />Board of Regents Bylaws – Chapter 4 – Rights and Responsibilities of Professional Staff<br />UNMC Code of Conduct – Policy # 8006<br />UNMC Social Media – Policy # 6081<br />AACN Essentials<br />The National Task Force on Quality Nurse Practitioner Education (NONPF) Criteria for Evaluation of NP Programs  </div></td>
     <td colspan="2" valign="top">Related Documents: <br /><div style="margin-left:3em; line-height:1.2;">[[CON Standards and Guidelines for Promotion and Tenure for Academic Rank|Appendix A1 – Standards and Guidelines for Promotion and Tenure for Academic Rank]]<br />[[CON Standards for Promotion for Clinical Rank|Appendix A1 – Standards and Guidelines for Promotion for Clinical Rank]]<br />[[CON Guidelines for Doctorally Prepared Faculty Role Differentiation|Appendix B1 – Guidelines for Doctorally Prepared Faculty Role Differentiation]]<br />[[CON Faculty Evaluation|Policy 4.2.7 – Faculty Evaluation]]<br />Policy 4.1 – Rules of the Faculty Organization<br />Board of Regents Bylaws – Chapter 4 – Rights and Responsibilities of Professional Staff<br />UNMC Code of Conduct – Policy # 8006<br />UNMC Social Media – Policy # 6081<br />AACN Essentials<br />The National Task Force on Quality Nurse Practitioner Education (NONPF) Criteria for Evaluation of NP Programs  </div></td>
     </tr>
     </tr>
</table>
</table>