11,224
edits
CON Procedures for Handling Undergraduate Student Appeals of Academic Evaluations: Difference between revisions
CON Procedures for Handling Undergraduate Student Appeals of Academic Evaluations (view source)
Revision as of 18:51, September 7, 2025
, September 7→Policy:
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 56: | Line 56: | ||
<br /> | <br /> | ||
===Policy | ===Policy=== | ||
<p style="margin-bottom:15px;max-width:70em !important;">Paragraph 5.3 of the Bylaws of the Board of Regents provides in part as follows: Each college or school shall provide for a faculty-student appeals committee for students who believe that evaluation of their academic progress has been prejudiced or capricious. Such procedure shall provide for changing of student's evaluation upon the committee's finding that an academic evaluation by a member of a faculty has been prejudiced or capricious. </p> | <p style="margin-bottom:15px;max-width:70em !important;">Paragraph 5.3 of the Bylaws of the Board of Regents provides in part as follows: Each college or school shall provide for a faculty-student appeals committee for students who believe that evaluation of their academic progress has been prejudiced or capricious. Such procedure shall provide for changing of student's evaluation upon the committee's finding that an academic evaluation by a member of a faculty has been prejudiced or capricious. </p> | ||
<p style="margin-bottom:15px;max-width:70em !important;">See also UNMC College of Nursing Policies: | <p style="margin-bottom:15px;max-width:70em !important;">See also UNMC College of Nursing Policies: Internal Affairs Committee Rules of the Faculty Organization and Policy 2501 Undergraduate Student Grade Appeal. Please note: A student looking at this procedure should also look at the full University Student Code of Conduct and Appeals of Academic Evaluations. </p> | ||
===Procedure Definitions:=== | ===Procedure Definitions:=== | ||
<ul style="max-width:67em !important;"> | <ul style="max-width:67em !important;"> | ||