CON Undergraduate Affairs Committee: Difference between revisions

Line 58: Line 58:
<ul style="max-width:67em !important;list-style-type: lower-alpha; margin-bottom:15px;">
<ul style="max-width:67em !important;list-style-type: lower-alpha; margin-bottom:15px;">
     <li style="margin-left:3em; margin-bottom:15px;">Develop and review criteria for undergraduate student admission, progression, graduation, and scholarship/grant awards.  
     <li style="margin-left:3em; margin-bottom:15px;">Develop and review criteria for undergraduate student admission, progression, graduation, and scholarship/grant awards.  
           <ul style="max-width:4em !important;list-style-type: lower-alpha; margin-bottom:15px;">
           <ul style="max-width:64em !important;list-style-type: lower-alpha; margin-bottom:15px;">
               <li style="margin-left:3em; margin-bottom:15px;">Review progression reports and formal program evaluations annually to detect patterns and problem areas and make recommendations to the Associate Dean for Academic Programs, the Director of Undergraduate Programs and/or the division assistant dean, or the committee. </li>
               <li style="margin-left:3em; margin-bottom:15px;">Review progression reports and formal program evaluations annually to detect patterns and problem areas and make recommendations to the Associate Dean for Academic Programs, the Director of Undergraduate Programs and/or the division assistant dean, or the committee. </li>
           </ul>
           </ul>