9,879
edits
CON Professional Graduate Nursing Program Grievance Procedure: Difference between revisions
CON Professional Graduate Nursing Program Grievance Procedure (view source)
Revision as of 09:43, July 13, 2016
, July 13, 2016→Purpose:
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 62: | Line 62: | ||
===Purpose:=== | ===Purpose:=== | ||
<p style="margin-bottom:15px;max-width:70em !important;">Under the provision of the Bylaws of the Board of Regents ([http://www.nebraska.edu/docs/board/bylaws.pdf <em>see Chapter 5 of the Bylaws of the Board of Regents</em>]), students may appeal academic evaluations; discipline related to academic integrity and conduct and report a grievance.</p> | <p style="margin-bottom:15px;max-width:70em !important;">Under the provision of the Bylaws of the Board of Regents ([http://www.nebraska.edu/docs/board/bylaws.pdf <em>see Chapter 5 of the Bylaws of the Board of Regents</em>]), students may appeal academic evaluations; discipline related to academic integrity and conduct and report a grievance.</p> | ||
<p style="margin-bottom:15px;max-width:70em !important;">Faculty Section 4.1 (Rules of the Faculty Organization) and Policy 4.1.7 (Professional Graduate Nursing | <p style="margin-bottom:15px;max-width:70em !important;">Faculty Section 4.1 (Rules of the Faculty Organization) and Policy 4.1.7 (Professional Graduate Nursing Affairs Committee) state that a committee shall review professional graduate nursing program student appeals and grievance reports, determine appropriate course of action and submit committee recommendations, and report to all appropriate parties in accordance with written procedures and as stipulated by the Bylaws of the Board of Regents.</p> | ||
====Academic Evaluation and Discipline related to Academic Integrity and Conduct Procedures==== | ====Academic Evaluation and Discipline related to Academic Integrity and Conduct Procedures==== | ||
| Line 69: | Line 69: | ||
<li style="margin-bottom:15px;">It is recognized that students and faculty initiate, develop and maintain professional relationships in the teaching-learning process. To this end, it is strongly encouraged that students seek consultation with individual faculty whenever there are questions about the determination of a grade or disciplinary actions. In all cases, informal discussion between faculty and student is preferred to resolve any potential miscommunication in an evaluation that has been determined. As a result of this consultation, faculty will maintain the right to retain or change an evaluation. Factors such as misinterpretation of scoring, mathematical calculation, or other factors should be objectively discussed so that both faculty and student conclude the informal communication process with an understanding of the nature of the issue at hand.</li> | <li style="margin-bottom:15px;">It is recognized that students and faculty initiate, develop and maintain professional relationships in the teaching-learning process. To this end, it is strongly encouraged that students seek consultation with individual faculty whenever there are questions about the determination of a grade or disciplinary actions. In all cases, informal discussion between faculty and student is preferred to resolve any potential miscommunication in an evaluation that has been determined. As a result of this consultation, faculty will maintain the right to retain or change an evaluation. Factors such as misinterpretation of scoring, mathematical calculation, or other factors should be objectively discussed so that both faculty and student conclude the informal communication process with an understanding of the nature of the issue at hand.</li> | ||
<li style="margin-bottom:15px;">If, after the initial discussion cited in step #1 of this procedure, a student in the professional graduate nursing program (MSN, post-master, and DNP) believes that an evaluation or discipline has been rendered in an arbitrary or capricious manner, the student may discuss the concern with their faculty advisor, specialty coordinator or program director and if no resolution is reached, the student will be referred to the Division Assistant Dean. If no resolution is reached, the student will be counseled on the formal appeal procedure by the Assistant Dean. Based on this conversation, the student may or may not choose to proceed to seek a formal appeal of the evaluation. The role of faculty advisor, specialty coordinator, program director, or Division Assistant Dean, is one of neutral objective information sharing and consultation.</li> | <li style="margin-bottom:15px;">If, after the initial discussion cited in step #1 of this procedure, a student in the professional graduate nursing program (MSN, post-master, and DNP) believes that an evaluation or discipline has been rendered in an arbitrary or capricious manner, the student may discuss the concern with their faculty advisor, specialty coordinator or program director and if no resolution is reached, the student will be referred to the Division Assistant Dean. If no resolution is reached, the student will be counseled on the formal appeal procedure by the Assistant Dean. Based on this conversation, the student may or may not choose to proceed to seek a formal appeal of the evaluation. The role of faculty advisor, specialty coordinator, program director, or Division Assistant Dean, is one of neutral objective information sharing and consultation.</li> | ||
<li style="margin-bottom:15px;">If the student chooses to seek a formal appeal, the student must submit an official written appeal to the Chair of the Professional Graduate Nursing | <li style="margin-bottom:15px;">If the student chooses to seek a formal appeal, the student must submit an official written appeal to the Chair of the Professional Graduate Nursing Affairs Committee and to the Associate Dean for Academic Programs within 10 days of receiving the evaluation. Upon receiving the student’s written statement, the Chair of the Committee may elect to meet with the student and faculty to understand the nature of the concern.</li> | ||
<li style="margin-bottom:15px;">If the appeal goes forward, the Associate Dean for Academic Programs (with consultation of the Chair of the Professional Graduate Nursing | <li style="margin-bottom:15px;">If the appeal goes forward, the Associate Dean for Academic Programs (with consultation of the Chair of the Professional Graduate Nursing Affairs Committee) will appoint an ad hoc appeals committee. The ad hoc appeals committee will be comprised of no fewer than 5 individuals: 1 faculty chairperson, 2 faculty members, and 2 student representatives. The Dean of the CON will appoint the 2 student representatives. The student representatives will be from a specialty area different from the student who is appealing.</li> | ||
<li style="margin-bottom:15px;">All members of the ad hoc appeals committee will be equal voting members and will not have a conflict or competing interest in the outcome.</li> | <li style="margin-bottom:15px;">All members of the ad hoc appeals committee will be equal voting members and will not have a conflict or competing interest in the outcome.</li> | ||
<li style="margin-bottom:15px;">The ad hoc appeals committee chair will convene and record a hearing with the members of the committee. The Chair will conduct the meeting in a civil and non-threatening manner and there will be breaks as needed. The appeals committee chair or members may request any additional materials that they deem to be essential in the information gathering process. In addition, the committee may choose to meet with the faculty or student as needed. The student has a right to request to meet with the committee and to have a support person who cannot actively participate in the hearing, but confer with the student during the hearing.</li> | <li style="margin-bottom:15px;">The ad hoc appeals committee chair will convene and record a hearing with the members of the committee. The Chair will conduct the meeting in a civil and non-threatening manner and there will be breaks as needed. The appeals committee chair or members may request any additional materials that they deem to be essential in the information gathering process. In addition, the committee may choose to meet with the faculty or student as needed. The student has a right to request to meet with the committee and to have a support person who cannot actively participate in the hearing, but confer with the student during the hearing.</li> | ||