9,875
edits
(Created page with "<!-- ************************ MENU TEMPLATE START ******************************************* --> <table style="max-width:70em !important;background:#F8FCFF; text-align:center...") |
|||
Line 45: | Line 45: | ||
<table width="100%" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"> | <table width="100%" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
<td>Revised: [[CON Professional Graduate Nursing Program Appeals and Grievance Procedure version October 2014|October 2014]]<br />Revised: [[CON Professional Graduate Nursing Program Appeals and Grievance Procedure version May 2015|May 2015]]<br />Revised: May 2016</td> | <td>Revised: [[CON Professional Graduate Nursing Program Appeals and Grievance Procedure version October 2014|October 2014]]<br />Revised: [[CON Professional Graduate Nursing Program Appeals and Grievance Procedure version May 2015|May 2015]]<br />Revised: [[CON Professional Graduate Nursing Program Appeals and Grievance Procedure version May 2016|May 2016]]<br />Revised: March 2018</td> | ||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
</table> | </table> | ||
Line 69: | Line 69: | ||
<li style="margin-bottom:15px;">It is recognized that students and faculty initiate, develop and maintain professional relationships in the teaching-learning process. To this end, it is strongly encouraged that students seek consultation with individual faculty whenever there are questions about the determination of a grade or disciplinary actions. In all cases, informal discussion between faculty and student is preferred to resolve any potential miscommunication in an evaluation that has been determined. As a result of this consultation, faculty will maintain the right to retain or change an evaluation. Factors such as misinterpretation of scoring, mathematical calculation, or other factors should be objectively discussed so that both faculty and student conclude the informal communication process with an understanding of the nature of the issue at hand.</li> | <li style="margin-bottom:15px;">It is recognized that students and faculty initiate, develop and maintain professional relationships in the teaching-learning process. To this end, it is strongly encouraged that students seek consultation with individual faculty whenever there are questions about the determination of a grade or disciplinary actions. In all cases, informal discussion between faculty and student is preferred to resolve any potential miscommunication in an evaluation that has been determined. As a result of this consultation, faculty will maintain the right to retain or change an evaluation. Factors such as misinterpretation of scoring, mathematical calculation, or other factors should be objectively discussed so that both faculty and student conclude the informal communication process with an understanding of the nature of the issue at hand.</li> | ||
<li style="margin-bottom:15px;">If, after the initial discussion cited in step #1 of this procedure, a student in the professional graduate nursing program (MSN, post-master, and DNP) believes that an evaluation or discipline has been rendered in an arbitrary or capricious manner, the student may discuss the concern with their faculty advisor, specialty coordinator or program director and if no resolution is reached, the student will be referred to the Division Assistant Dean. If no resolution is reached, the student will be counseled on the formal appeal procedure by the Assistant Dean. Based on this conversation, the student may or may not choose to proceed to seek a formal appeal of the evaluation. The role of faculty advisor, specialty coordinator, program director, or Division Assistant Dean, is one of neutral objective information sharing and consultation.</li> | <li style="margin-bottom:15px;">If, after the initial discussion cited in step #1 of this procedure, a student in the professional graduate nursing program (MSN, post-master, and DNP) believes that an evaluation or discipline has been rendered in an arbitrary or capricious manner, the student may discuss the concern with their faculty advisor, specialty coordinator or program director and if no resolution is reached, the student will be referred to the Division Assistant Dean. If no resolution is reached, the student will be counseled on the formal appeal procedure by the Assistant Dean. Based on this conversation, the student may or may not choose to proceed to seek a formal appeal of the evaluation. The role of faculty advisor, specialty coordinator, program director, or Division Assistant Dean, is one of neutral objective information sharing and consultation.</li> | ||
<li style="margin-bottom:15px;">If the student chooses to seek a formal appeal, the student must submit an official written appeal to the | <li style="margin-bottom:15px;">If the student chooses to seek a formal appeal, the student must submit an official written appeal to the chair of the Professional Graduate Nursing Affairs Committee and to the Associate Dean for Academic Programs within 10 days of receiving the evaluation. Upon receiving the student’s written statement, the Chair of the Committee may elect to meet with the student and faculty to understand the nature of the concern.</li> | ||
<li style="margin-bottom:15px;">If the appeal goes forward, the Associate Dean for Academic Programs (with consultation of the | <li style="margin-bottom:15px;">If the appeal goes forward, the Associate Dean for Academic Programs (with consultation of the committee chair) will appoint an ad hoc appeals committee. The ad hoc appeals committee will be comprised of no fewer than 5 individuals: 1 faculty chairperson, 2 faculty members, and 2 student representatives. The Dean of the CON will appoint the 2 student representatives. The student representatives will be from a specialty area different from the student who is appealing.</li> | ||
<li style="margin-bottom:15px;">All members of the ad hoc appeals committee will be equal voting members and will not have a conflict or competing interest in the outcome.</li> | <li style="margin-bottom:15px;">All members of the ad hoc appeals committee will be equal voting members and will not have a conflict or competing interest in the outcome.</li> | ||
<li style="margin-bottom:15px;">The ad hoc appeals committee chair will convene and record a hearing with the members of the committee. The | <li style="margin-bottom:15px;">The ad hoc appeals committee chair will convene and record a hearing with the members of the committee. The chair will conduct the meeting in a civil and non-threatening manner and there will be breaks as needed. The appeals committee chair or members may request any additional materials that they deem to be essential in the information gathering process. In addition, the committee may choose to meet with the faculty or student as needed. The student has a right to request to meet with the committee and to have a support person who cannot actively participate in the hearing, but confer with the student during the hearing.</li> | ||
<li style="margin-bottom:15px;">Upon conclusion of the hearing, the ad hoc appeals committee members will determine if there was the existence of arbitrary and capricious behavior. The chair of the Professional Graduate Nursing | <li style="margin-bottom:15px;">Upon conclusion of the hearing, the ad hoc appeals committee members will determine if there was the existence of arbitrary and capricious behavior. The chair of the Professional Graduate Nursing Affairs Committee will be notified at the conclusion of the hearing of the outcome to either support or not support the appeal.</li> | ||
<li style="margin-bottom:15px;">The | <li style="margin-bottom:15px;">The committee chair will communicate the findings of the ad hoc appeals committee to the involved faculty member, student, and specialty coordinator.</li> | ||
<li style="margin-bottom:15px;">The ad hoc appeals committee chair will write a confidential report which describes the decision making process and steps taken in the deliberation, including the decision, and will send the report to the | <li style="margin-bottom:15px;">The ad hoc appeals committee chair will write a confidential report which describes the decision making process and steps taken in the deliberation, including the decision, and will send the report to the committee chair and to the Associate Dean For Academic Programs within 48 hours of conclusion of the hearing.</li> | ||
<li style="margin-bottom:15px;">The findings from the hearing will be communicated to the Professional Graduate Nursing | <li style="margin-bottom:15px;">The findings from the hearing will be communicated to the Professional Graduate Nursing Affairs committee members. The committee will vote to support or not support the recommendation of the ad hoc appeals committee.</li> | ||
<li style="margin-bottom:15px;">The faculty member involved in the appeal will receive the results of the decision of the vote (support or not support) from the | <li style="margin-bottom:15px;">The faculty member involved in the appeal will receive the results of the decision of the vote (support or not support) from the committee. If the faculty member disagrees with the committee decision, the faculty member has the right to appeal to the Dean.</li> | ||
<li style="margin-bottom:15px;">The student will be notified by the | <li style="margin-bottom:15px;">The student will be notified by the committee chair or by the Associate Dean for Academic Affairs of any changes in the findings of the proceedings.</li> | ||
<li style="margin-bottom:15px;">If the appeal is not supportive of the student, the student may request deliberation by the Dean. The Dean will deliberate the issue and make a determination of the final decision of the appeal. The Dean shall affirm, modify, or reverse the decision as she deems proper.</li> | <li style="margin-bottom:15px;">If the appeal is not supportive of the student, the student may request deliberation by the Dean. The Dean will deliberate the issue and make a determination of the final decision of the appeal. The Dean shall affirm, modify, or reverse the decision as she deems proper.</li> | ||
</ol> | </ol> |