CON Scholarship Guidelines for Doctoral-Prepared Faculty Role Differentiation

Home

Appendices

UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER COLLEGE OF NURSING
Guidelines for Doctorally Prepared Faculty Role Differentiation	Subsection: Appendix B1
Section - Appendices	Originating Date: January 2006
Responsible Reviewing Agency: Executive Council	Revised: January 2007 Revised: November 2007 Revised: January 2018 Revised: June 2020 (changes) Revised: June 2024 (changes) Currently undergoing revision
Related documents: 4.2.7 Faculty Evaluation UNMC CON Annual Faculty Activity Review Form 4.4.6(1) Promotion and Tenure for Academic Rank 4.4.6(2) Promotion for Clinical Rank Appendix A1 Standards and Guidelines for Promotion and Tenure for Academic Rank Appendix A2 Standards and Guidelines for Promotion to Clinical Rank American Association of Colleges of Nursing [AACN]. (2018, March 26). Defining Scholarship for Academic Nursing Task Force Consensus Position Statement

I. Overview

The College of Nursing (CON) shoulders responsibility for effectively addressing its missions and meeting its responsibilities to the University of Nebraska Medical Center and to the state of Nebraska. The faculty of the College collectively assumes the responsibility and associated activity of fulfilling the teaching, research, service, and practice missions of the College in concert with the College's Strategic Plan.

Within this broad mandate, the relative proportion of effort devoted to each of the tripartite missions by any single faculty varies. While all faculty are expected to teach and participate in service, the relative weight of these and other activities varies according to the needs of the CON and the individual strengths and training of each faculty. When hired, faculty receive an offer letter, contract, and Appendix A of the employment agreement, with effort allocation for teaching, scholarship (teaching, research, practice), and service/practice to include any specific variations that are planned to occur in the percentage of time over the course of the contract period.

Doctoral-prepared faculty are expected to be productive in a program of scholarship. Based on these considerations, faculty and their assistant dean mutually create an annual faculty activity plan that includes teaching and professional service, and in addition, a focused plan for scholarship, either teaching, research, or practice. A competitive start-up package may be negotiated by the dean, assistant dean, and Associate Dean for Research. The start-up package may include FTE effort allocation, equipment, travel, graduate assistant, etc., contingent on resources and candidate needs.

Scholarship in the areas of teaching, research, and practice is critical for the advancement of the discipline, for creating an optimal environment for student learning, and for meeting the College’s obligations to the University. Scholarship is defined as generating and disseminating new knowledge. New knowledge can be in any number of areas, for example, new teaching methods and models, data-based research, synthesis of extant knowledge, practice innovations, and the development of evidence-based practice guidelines and protocols. New knowledge is disseminated through scholarly publications in respected, peer-reviewed journals and presentations to regional, national, and international audiences. In addition, faculty shoulder the responsibility to bring in funding to support their scholarship. Faculty receive investment time for scholarship with the expectation that they will become funded for this effort. Tangible outcomes, such as funded grants and contracts and publications are considered the return on investment. Outcomes in relation to goals should be documented at each annual evaluation of faculty and considered in the negotiation process for allocation of effort.

II. Faculty Preferred Activity Plan Guidelines

The Dean and Executive Council annually assess the needs and resources of the College of Nursing for the next academic year. Division assistant deans collaborate with each other and the appropriate associate deans and directors to determine teaching assignments so as to cover the courses of the College.

Three pathways for doctoral-prepared faculty include being teaching, research, and practice scholars. Doctoral-prepared faculty propose their professional goals for the next year and negotiate with their assistant dean for their activity plan.

Annual Activity Expectations for Doctoral-prepared Faculty

Doctoral-prepared faculty negotiate their preferred focus of scholarship among teaching, research, or practice (refer to 4.4.6(1) Promotion and Tenure for Academic Rank, 4.4.6(2) Promotion and Tenure for Clinical Rank, Appendix A1 Standards and Guidelines for Promotion and Tenure for Academic Rank, Appendix A2 Standards and Guidelines for Promotion to Clinical Rank). The two selected primary areas of accomplishment (teaching, scholarly activity, and professional service should be complimentary; one should support the other.

Annual Review of Scholarship Effort with Associated Metrics

Faculty members with scholarship FTE of < .30 and their respective assistant dean/supervisor shall meet annually to negotiate scholarship FTE for the following year.

For faculty with FTE > .30. A meeting will be held every 6 months with faculty, mentor (if appropriate), assistant dean (or supervisor) and Associate Dean for Research for the first 3 years of employment prior to annual evaluation of faculty. Meetings will occur annually, with this group, after the first 3 years. The Associate Dean of Research and assistant dean will negotiate scholarship FTE for the following year for all faculty with >.30 FTE. See table below for proposed metrics associated with FTE allocation for all doctoral-prepared faculty.

Table 1. Guidance for Metrics and Review Schedule for Scholarship FTE Assignment for Doctoral-prepared Faculty who have been employed at the CON for three years or longer and who have Scholarly Activity (research, teaching, or professional service) as one of their area of emphasis. Metrics and Review Schedule for Doctoral Prepared Faculty

Scholarship FTE	Scholarship Metrics	Teaching FTE	Service/Practice FTE	Annual Meeting Attendees
.10 to .19	1 publication/year (preferably first author, related to program of scholarship)1 Grand application as Co-Investigator (Co-I)	.70 - .80	10% + as negotiated If faculty has practice effort, adjust teaching effort to accommodate practice contract	Assistant Dean & Mentor
.20 to .29	1 publication/year as first author, related to program of scholarship1 1 internal/external grant application/year as Principal Investigator (PI). Grants allowing for effort coverage preferred	.60 - .70	Same as above	Assistant Dean & Mentor
.30 to .39	2 publications/year (at least one first author, at least one data-based related to program of scholarship)1 2, small-medium ($50K-$250K), external grant applications/year as either PI or Co-PI. Grant must allow for effort coverage. If small-medium grant already funded, 1 additional small/medium external grant application/year as either Pi or Co-PI. Grant must allow for effort coverage.	.50 - .60	Same as above	Associate Dean for Research, Assistant Dean & Mentor (if application)2
.40 to .49	3 publications/year (at least one first author, at least two data-based related to program of scholarship)1 2, large (>$250K/year), external grant applications/year as either PI or Co-PI. Grant must allow for effort coverage. If large grant already funded, 1 additional large external grant application/year as either Pi or Co-PI. Grant must allow for effort coverage.	.40 - .50	Same as above	Associate Dean for Research, Assistant Dean & Mentor (if applicable)2
>.50	Dependent on external funding/effort coverage 3 publications/year (at least one first author, at least two data-based related to program of scholarship)1 2, large (>$250K/year), external grant applications/year as either PI or Co-PI. Grant must allow for effort coverage. If large grant already funded, 1 additional large external grant application/year as either Pi or Co-PI. Grant must allow for effort coverage.	As effort warrants	Same as above	Associate Dean for Research, Assistant Dean & Mentor (if applicable)2

¹ Last author publications may be an acceptable substitute for first author publications depending on rank
² If metrics not met, Scholarship FTE is reduced.

Table 2. Guidance for Metrics and Review Schedule for Scholarship FTE Assignment for Doctoral-prepared Faculty with Post-doctoral Training for first three years of employment at UNMC who have Scholarly Activity (research, teaching, or professional service) as one of their area of emphasis. Hired on a HPA track.

Scholarship FTE	Scholarship Metrics	Teaching FTE	Service/Practice FTE	Annual Meeting Requirements
Year 1 0.8 FTE	3 publications/year (at least 2 first author, at least 2 data-based, related to program of scholarship) 2 pilot grant applications/year, internal or external as PI	10% As negotiated with supervisor/ semester1	10% + as negotiated If faculty has practice effort, adjust scholarship/teaching effort as needed	Every 6 months with Associate Dean for Research, Assistant Dean, & Mentor 2
Year 2 0.7 FTE	3 publications/year (at least 2 first author, at least one data-based, related to program of scholarship) 2 grant applications/year, 1 internal and 1 external as PI	10% As negotiated with supervisor/ semester1	Same as above	>Every 6 months with Associate Dean for Research, Assistant Dean, & Mentor 2

Teaching Scholar

It is anticipated in the role of educator, doctoral-prepared faculty will have a program of scholarship for knowledge development related to teaching and training programs that contributes to the tripartite mission of the CON. Faculty will disseminate results in publications and presentations. Faculty will want to be recognized for teaching excellence beyond course evaluations, such as in requests for teaching consultation, service on local, regional, national and international boards, recipient of teaching awards, textbook awards, etc. Faculty who are focused on teaching excellence should negotiate substantial time for teaching scholarship, grant funding must be obtained, such as with training grants and funding for teaching innovations.

Research Scholar

It is anticipated that in the role of researcher, doctoral-prepared faculty will have a research program for knowledge development (efficacy), effectiveness (testing in real world settings) or implementation science (integrated into systems, community etc.) that contributes to the tripartite mission of the CON. Their efforts should be disseminated in publications and presentations which indicate productivity as a researcher. Grant submissions and funding mechanisms must be pursued and is required in order for a faculty who wants to be recognized for research excellence in their faculty role and to negotiate substantial time for research. Research faculty should be leaders in local, regional, and national arenas with such activities as serving on research boards or councils, journal boards and study sections, councils for professional research organizations.

Practice Scholar

It is anticipated that in the role of clinician, doctoral-prepared faculty will have a practice that contributes to the tripartite mission of the CON. Their efforts should be disseminated in publications, white papers, guidelines and presentations which indicate productivity as a practitioner. Practice faculty should be leaders in local, regional, and national arenas with such activities as serving on practice boards, conducting quality improvement projects, translating research to practice, conducting evidence-based practice programs, and becoming funded for practice innovations and ventures. Practice faculty must generate income for time spent in service or as a practitioner as part of their faculty role at the CON.

General

Designation and metrics for FTE allocation in any of the roles is not fixed but rather is predicated on faculty’s past accountability, success, and future interests, which may change over time, and on the College’s need and resources to address the tri-partite mission of the CON. Supervisors will consider return on invested time in the role in negotiating assignments on a yearly basis. Supervisors are also responsible for assisting faculty with identifying the different roles that will result in promotion and tenure.