CON Faculty Evaluation: Difference between revisions

                 <td>Revised: October 1997<br />Revised: May 2003<br />Revised: [[CON Faculty Evaluation version November 2007|November 2007]]<br />Revised: [[CON_Faculty_Evaluation_version_January 2015|January 2015]]<br />Revised: February 2016</td>

     <td colspan="2" valign="top">Related Documents: <br /><div style="margin-left:3em; line-height:1.2;">Appendix A1<br />Appendix A2<br />Appendix B<br />

[[CON_Promotion_and_Tenure_for_Academic_Rank|Promotion and Tenure Policy 4.4.6]]</div></td>

     <li style="margin-bottom:15px;">The period of evaluation typically is from January 1 to December 31 of the previous year in line with an approximately 12-month period.</li>

     <li style="margin-bottom:15px;">In advance of the meeting, the faculty member completes the Annual Faculty Self-Evaluation form and updates their CV by the designated due date. The faculty member also collects and supplies any other documents to be included in the evaluation (e.g., peer evaluations, letters of support or recognition,  other documentation); and emails the packet to his/her designated administrator. The administrator will consider the material and provide performance ratings of the faculty member’s performance relative to each tripartite mission role function and a brief narrative evaluation summary. </li>

     <li style="margin-bottom:15px;">The faculty member and designated administrator meet to discuss the evaluative materials and set goals for the next academic year as well as plans for achieving the goals. In collaboration with their designated administrator, faculty members develop annual goals that are congruent with the CON standards for Promotion and Tenure (See Appendix A), the tripartite mission, and, as appropriate, with the strategic plan.</li>

     <li style="margin-left:3em; margin-bottom:15px;">Allow for promotion and tenure or triggered post-tenure review. ¹</li>