9,138
edits
CON Procedures for Handling Undergraduate Student Appeals of Academic Evaluations: Difference between revisions
CON Procedures for Handling Undergraduate Student Appeals of Academic Evaluations (view source)
Revision as of 14:39, August 6, 2022
, August 6, 2022no edit summary
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 57: | Line 57: | ||
<br /> | <br /> | ||
<p>'''This policy is currently under revision. Please refer to the earlier version linked in the header until this work is complete.'''</p> | <!-- <p>'''This policy is currently under revision. Please refer to the earlier version linked in the header until this work is complete.'''</p>--> | ||
===Policy:=== | ===Policy:=== | ||
<p style="margin-bottom:15px;max-width:70em !important;">Paragraph 5.3 of the Bylaws of the Board of Regents provides in part as follows: Each college or school shall provide for a faculty-student appeals committee for students who believe that evaluation of their academic progress has been prejudiced or capricious. Such procedure shall provide for changing of student's evaluation upon the committee's finding that an academic evaluation by a member of a faculty has been prejudiced or capricious. </p> | <p style="margin-bottom:15px;max-width:70em !important;">Paragraph 5.3 of the Bylaws of the Board of Regents provides in part as follows: Each college or school shall provide for a faculty-student appeals committee for students who believe that evaluation of their academic progress has been prejudiced or capricious. Such procedure shall provide for changing of student's evaluation upon the committee's finding that an academic evaluation by a member of a faculty has been prejudiced or capricious. </p> | ||