CON Standards for Promotion for Clinical Rank: Difference between revisions

Line 80: Line 80:
<li style="margin-bottom:15px;">Faculty members will notify P&amp;T Chair in writing (hard copy or email) of the intent to apply for promotion by '''April 15''' in the year prior to when action regarding promotion  will be deliberated. This should have been discussed with their division assistant dean or supervisor  and acknowledged on the form prior to submission. Be specific on exactly what you are seeking; e.g. clinical associate professor. Please indicate your level of accomplishments in each of the areas. For example, clinical associate professor rank must be able to demonstrate a sustained record at Level II for two areas and Level I for one area. For example: My two areas for level two are ________ and the area for level one is ________.</li>
<li style="margin-bottom:15px;">Faculty members will notify P&amp;T Chair in writing (hard copy or email) of the intent to apply for promotion by '''April 15''' in the year prior to when action regarding promotion  will be deliberated. This should have been discussed with their division assistant dean or supervisor  and acknowledged on the form prior to submission. Be specific on exactly what you are seeking; e.g. clinical associate professor. Please indicate your level of accomplishments in each of the areas. For example, clinical associate professor rank must be able to demonstrate a sustained record at Level II for two areas and Level I for one area. For example: My two areas for level two are ________ and the area for level one is ________.</li>


<li style="margin-bottom:15px;">Faculty members will complete the '''Contact Information for Clinical Rank Promotion''' (located at https://www.unmc.edu/nursing/faculty/faculty-promotion-and-tenure.html) for each of the five potential external reviewers and submit to the P&amp;T Chair by '''May 15'''. Suggested external reviewers must be outside the University of Nebraska system and cannot be a recent or current collaborator, consultant, mentor or someone with whom the faculty member has another close professional or personal relationship. Generally, external reviewers in other universities should have professional ranks at or above that being considered for the candidate and be qualified to critically evaluate the importance of the candidate’s work and their status in the professional community. For reviewers in academia, reviewers must be at the requested clinical or academic rank higher that the applicant’s current level or equivalent if at professor rank. </li>
<li style="margin-bottom:15px;">Faculty members will complete the '''Contact Information for Clinical Rank Promotion''' for each of the five potential external reviewers and submit to the P&amp;T Chair by '''May 15'''. Suggested external reviewers must be outside the University of Nebraska system and cannot be a recent or current collaborator, consultant, mentor or someone with whom the faculty member has another close professional or personal relationship. Generally, external reviewers in other universities should have professional ranks at or above that being considered for the candidate and be qualified to critically evaluate the importance of the candidate’s work and their status in the professional community. For reviewers in academia, reviewers must be at the requested clinical or academic rank higher that the applicant’s current level or equivalent if at professor rank. </li>


<li style="margin-bottom:15px;">The External Reviewer Waiver Form for Clinical Promotion must be signed and submitted along with the Contact Information for External Reviewer Forms to the P&amp;T Chair by '''May 15'''.</li>
<li style="margin-bottom:15px;">The External Reviewer Waiver Form for Clinical Promotion must be signed and submitted along with the Contact Information for External Reviewer Forms to the P&amp;T Chair by '''May 15'''.</li>