9,362
edits
CON Undergraduate Academic Review Committee Rules of the Faculty Organization: Difference between revisions
CON Undergraduate Academic Review Committee Rules of the Faculty Organization (view source)
Revision as of 13:58, August 3, 2022
, August 3, 2022→2. Functions:
| Line 61: | Line 61: | ||
===2. Functions:=== | ===2. Functions:=== | ||
<ol type="a" style="max-width:70em !important; "> | |||
<li style="margin-left:3em;">Review submitted written appeals and administer the procedural steps to determine appeal outcomes of students who allege the evaluation of their academic progress has been prejudicial or capricious.</li> | |||
<li style="margin-left:3em;">Provide information to students, faculty, and administration about the appeal process, procedures and guidelines.</li> | |||
<li style="margin-left:3em;">Submit reports and conclusions of the committee in writing to the Undergraduate Program Director, students, and the faculty involved.</li> | |||
<li style="margin-left:3em;">Review <em>Bylaws of the Board of Regents of the University of Nebraska</em> and related procedures yearly.</li> | |||
</ol> | |||
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="100%" style="max-width:70em !important;"> | <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="100%" style="max-width:70em !important;"> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||