CON Faculty Evaluation: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 90: Line 90:
     <li style="margin-bottom:15px;">In advance of the meeting, the faculty member completes the Annual Faculty Self-Evaluation form and updates their CV according to the UNMC guidelines by the designated due date. The faculty member also collects and supplies any other documents to be included in the evaluation (e.g., peer evaluations, letters of support or recognition,  other documentation); and emails the packet to his/her designated administrator. The administrator will consider the material and provide performance ratings of the faculty member’s performance relative to each tripartite mission role function and a brief narrative evaluation summary. </li>
     <li style="margin-bottom:15px;">In advance of the meeting, the faculty member completes the Annual Faculty Self-Evaluation form and updates their CV according to the UNMC guidelines by the designated due date. The faculty member also collects and supplies any other documents to be included in the evaluation (e.g., peer evaluations, letters of support or recognition,  other documentation); and emails the packet to his/her designated administrator. The administrator will consider the material and provide performance ratings of the faculty member’s performance relative to each tripartite mission role function and a brief narrative evaluation summary. </li>
<li style="margin-bottom:15px;">When faculty evaluation materials are completed, the faculty member contacts the designated administrator's support staff to schedule a time to the evaluation meeting.</li>
<li style="margin-bottom:15px;">When faculty evaluation materials are completed, the faculty member contacts the designated administrator's support staff to schedule a time to the evaluation meeting.</li>
     <li style="margin-bottom:15px;">The faculty member and designated administrator meet to discuss the evaluative materials and set goals for the next academic year as well as plans for achieving the goals. In collaboration with their designated administrator, faculty members develop annual goals that are congruent with the CON standards for Promotion and Tenure (See Appendix A), the tripartite mission, and, as appropriate, with the strategic plan.</li>
     <li style="margin-bottom:15px;">The faculty member and designated administrator meet to discuss the evaluative materials and set goals for the next academic year as well as plans for achieving the goals. In collaboration with their designated administrator, faculty members develop annual goals that are congruent with the CON standards for Promotion and Tenure (See Appendix A1 and A2), the tripartite mission, and, as appropriate, with the strategic plan. A summary of progress toward promotion and tenure across the years since last appointment be provided and reviewed with the Division Assistant Dean/Supervisor on an annual basis.</li>
     <li style="margin-bottom:15px;">Designated administrators provide faculty members guidance on how to improve in areas which have been identified for growth.</li>
     <li style="margin-bottom:15px;">Designated administrators provide faculty members guidance on how to improve in areas which have been identified for growth.</li>
     <li style="margin-bottom:15px;">The final written evaluation is dated and signed by the faculty member and designated administrator.</li>
     <li style="margin-bottom:15px;">The final written evaluation is dated and signed by the faculty member and designated administrator.</li>

Navigation menu