CON Undergraduate Academic Review Committee Rules of the Faculty Organization: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 241: Line 241:
     </ol>
     </ol>
</li>
</li>
     <li style="margin-left:3em;">The UG-ARC Hearing Board shall determine if the criteria were met to hold a hearing. The UG-ARC Hearing Board shall determine the appropriate process for decision making on the appeal. </li>
     <li style="margin-left:3em;">The UG-ARC Hearing Board shall determine if the criteria were met to hold a hearing. The UG-ARC Hearing Board shall determine the appropriate process for decision making on the appeal.
     <li style="margin-left:3em;">The UG- ARC Hearing Board may decide:</li>
    <ol type="i" style="max-width:67em !important; ">
          <li>If the UG-ARC Hearing Board determines a hearing is not warranted, the UG-ARC Chair will notify the student and Undergraduate Program Director. </li>
          <li>If the UG-ARC Hearing Board determines a hearing is warranted:
              <ol type="a" style="max-width:64em !important; ">
                    <li>The student may appear, if requested, and the request is approved by the UG-ARC Hearing Board.</li>
                    <li>The student faculty advisor may be present at the hearing but they may not actually participate in the proceedings unless the UG-ARC Hearing Board Chair specifically permits. </li>
                    <li>Faculty may appear if desired or called to testify, may present prior submitted evidence, and answer questions from the UG-ARC Hearing Board.
                        <ol type="i" style="max-width:64em !important; ">
                              <li>Faculty may also refuse any listed items in 3 (iii) unless student dismissal or expulsion is identified as an outcome. </li>
                        </ol>
                    </li>
                    <li>The UG-ARC Hearing Board members may question witnesses.
                        <ol type="i" style="max-width:64em !important; ">
                              <li>Witness must be UNMC students or faculty and a list must be provided to the UG-ARC Chair by the date set for submission of materials. </li>
                        </ol>
                    </li>
              </ol>
          </li>
    </ol>
</li>
     <li style="margin-left:3em;">The UG- ARC Hearing Board may decide:
          <ol type="i" style="max-width:67em !important; ">
              <li>The UG-ARC Hearing Board may rule on the basis of the written evidence and interview evidence submitted without the need for a hearing. </li>
              <li>The UG-ARC may agree to have the hearing without the student present </li>
              <li>The UG-ARC may agree to have the hearing with the student and faculty present.
                    <ol type="a" style="max-width:64em !important; ">
                        <li>A request to appear before the UG-ARC Hearing Board must be submitted by the student with and when the materials for the appeal are submitted. </li>
                        <li>This request to appear before the UG-ARC Hearing Board must be approved by the UG-ARC Chair.</li>
                    </ol>
              </li>
          </ol>
    </li>
     <li style="margin-left:3em;">The UG-ARC and UG- ARC Hearing Board shall adhere to policies and procedures for the College of Nursing, the University of Nebraska, the University Student Code of Conduct, the Bylaws of the Board of Regents of the University of Nebraska and any specific ethics for the nursing profession (i.e.: ANA Code of Ethics). </li>
     <li style="margin-left:3em;">The UG-ARC and UG- ARC Hearing Board shall adhere to policies and procedures for the College of Nursing, the University of Nebraska, the University Student Code of Conduct, the Bylaws of the Board of Regents of the University of Nebraska and any specific ethics for the nursing profession (i.e.: ANA Code of Ethics). </li>
     <li style="margin-left:3em;">The decision of the UG-ARC Hearing Board must be based on the majority affirmative vote.</li>
     <li style="margin-left:3em;">The decision of the UG-ARC Hearing Board must be based on the majority affirmative vote.
     <li style="margin-left:3em;">The UG-ARC Hearing Board has the following options: </li>
          <ol type="i" style="max-width:67em !important; ">
              <li>A vote shall be either a Yae or Nae. </li>
              <li>No UG-ARC Hearing Board member may abstain from the vote on the academic appeal. </li>
          </ol>
    </li>
     <li style="margin-left:3em;">The UG-ARC Hearing Board has the following options:  
          <ol type="i" style="max-width:67em !important; ">
              <li>Determine there is no basis for the appeal and that the weight of the evidence that the grade/evaluation was capricious or prejudiced was not met. This outcome upholds the faculty issued grade/evaluation. </li>
              <li>Grant the academic appeal if the grade/evaluation has been judged to be capricious and/ or prejudiced. </li>
              <li>Grant the academic appeal and suggest a new, less stringent action than the original academic evaluation from the course faculty. </li>
              <li>The CON Dean may be consulted at any time. but must be consulted if the proposed outcome is suspension or expulsion. </li>
              <li>The UG-ARC Hearing Board should request University counsel for advisement during the process of planning for the hearing and may request that counsel be present during the hearing </li>
          </ol>
    </li>
     <li style="margin-left:3em;">All voting will be conducted in a confidential manner. </li>
     <li style="margin-left:3em;">All voting will be conducted in a confidential manner. </li>
     <li style="margin-left:3em;">In the event that the UG-ARC Hearing Board has a parliamentarian question, that cannot be resolved unanimously, the CON Parliamentarian will be consulted. </li>
     <li style="margin-left:3em;">In the event that the UG-ARC Hearing Board has a parliamentarian question, that cannot be resolved unanimously, the CON Parliamentarian will be consulted. </li>
     <li style="margin-left:3em;">The UG-ARC Hearing Board Chair shall submit the report and conclusions of the appeal in writing to the Undergraduate Program Director within 5 days after determining the final decision. </li>
     <li style="margin-left:3em;">The UG-ARC Hearing Board Chair shall submit the report and conclusions of the appeal in writing to the Undergraduate Program Director within 5 days after determining the final decision. </li>
     <li style="margin-left:3em;">If the grade/evaluation has been judged to be fair and proper and if the student wishes to appeal further, the student may submit a written appeal to the Dean of the CON setting forth any reasons the student has for challenging the decision of the UG-ARC Hearing Board and UG-ARC. </li>
     <li style="margin-left:3em;">If the grade/evaluation has been judged to be fair and proper and if the student wishes to appeal further, the student may submit a written appeal to the Dean of the CON setting forth any reasons the student has for challenging the decision of the UG-ARC Hearing Board and UG-ARC.  
          <ol type="i" style="max-width:67em !important; ">
              <li>The student will have 10 university days to respond to the Dean after receiving the committee final decision. </li>
              <li>The Dean of the CON will review the record of the investigation and the facts to determine if the appeal procedure has been fair and thorough. The Dean may then either affirm the findings of the committee or direct the committee to conduct a reinvestigation or rehearing either in whole or in part. The decision of the Dean is final and no further appeal may be made.</li>
              <li>If no response is received from the student during the 10 university days then the decision will be considered final. </li>
          </ol>
    </li>
     <li style="margin-left:3em;">If the faculty member bringing forward the charge is debating the final UG-ARC Hearing Board decision; the faculty member will be directed to the procedures to follow in the appeal to the Dean of the CON. </li>
     <li style="margin-left:3em;">If the faculty member bringing forward the charge is debating the final UG-ARC Hearing Board decision; the faculty member will be directed to the procedures to follow in the appeal to the Dean of the CON. </li>
     <li style="margin-left:3em;">A verbatim recording of the hearing must be maintained and included in the report. </li>
     <li style="margin-left:3em;">A verbatim recording of the hearing must be maintained and included in the report.  
          <ol type="i" style="max-width:67em !important; ">
              <li>UG-ARC reports and information will be housed in Associate Dean's Office for a minimum of one year following the conclusion of the grade appeal or graduation, whichever occurs later . </li>
              <li>Each report will be placed in the CON Student's File and on the student's transcript when required by policy. </li>
          </ol>
    </li>
     <li style="margin-left:3em;">Refer to Academic and Professional Performance Policies in the UNMC Student Handbook and refer involved faculty to these materials and any others relevant to the formal appeal process. </li>
     <li style="margin-left:3em;">Refer to Academic and Professional Performance Policies in the UNMC Student Handbook and refer involved faculty to these materials and any others relevant to the formal appeal process. </li>
     <li style="margin-left:3em;">Refer to the CON Guidelines for Handling Student Appeals of Academic Evaluations Procedural Flow Sheet (Appendix N). </li>
     <li style="margin-left:3em;">Refer to the CON Guidelines for Handling Student Appeals of Academic Evaluations Procedural Flow Sheet (Appendix N).</li>
     <li style="margin-left:3em;">Academic grade appeal(s) requires the student to bear the burden of proof that a faculty member has been one or both of the following: </li>
     <li style="margin-left:3em;">Academic grade appeal(s) requires the student to bear the burden of proof that a faculty member has been one or both of the following:
     <li style="margin-left:3em;">The student will informally discuss an appeal directly with the faculty member involved/course coordinator immediately after receiving the grade alleged to be capricious or prejudiced. </li>
          <ol type="i" style="max-width:67em !important; ">
     <li style="margin-left:3em;">If a satisfactory agreement cannot be made, the student may appeal in writing to the Chair of the UG-ARC. </li>
              <li>Capricious</li>
     <li style="margin-left:3em;">The Undergraduate Academic Review Committee (UG-ARC), comprised of 10 undergraduate faculty members, will serve in accordance with the Rules & Regulations for this standing committee and in alignment with the Rules & Regulations of the Undergraduate Curriculum Committee, the Faculty Coordinating Council and General Faculty Organization.</li>
              <li>Prejudiced</li>
     <li style="margin-left:3em;">The Undergraduate Academic Review Committee (UG-ARC) Hearing Board, will be appointed 5 member subgroup from the UG-ARC assigned to a specific academic appeal, who are following the rules and the functions of the Committee for the specific student appeal and not representative of the campus involved. The UG-ARC Chair will preside over the hearing and be an non-voting member of the committee. </li>
          </ol>
    </li>
     <li style="margin-left:3em;">The student will informally discuss an appeal directly with the faculty member involved/course coordinator immediately after receiving the grade alleged to be capricious or prejudiced.
          <ol type="i" style="max-width:67em !important; ">
              <li>The student can informally discuss the appeal with the program director in which the course is offered after meeting with the faculty member involved/course coordinator. </li>
          </ol>
    </li>
     <li style="margin-left:3em;">If a satisfactory agreement cannot be made, the student may appeal in writing to the Chair of the UG-ARC.  
          <ol type="i" style="max-width:67em !important; ">
              <li>The student is required to submit the written evidence to the UG-ARC Chair, no later than (10 University days) after the challenged grade was posted or received </li>
              <li>The student will be required to:
                    <ol type="a" style="max-width:64em !important; ">
                        <li>Formally request an academic appeal by the UG-ARC</li>
                        <li>Provide written evidence with example utilizing one or both terms in 1(b) to determine if there is just cause for the academic review/appeal. </li>
                        <li>The student is also required in this written information to include a request to appear personally before the committee if the student wishes to do so and if a hearing is held. </li>
                    </ol>
              </li>
              <li>Include any request for additional time if appropriate </li>
              <li>Upon receiving the student’s request for appeal, the Chair of the UG-ARC will provide the student with a electronic link to the Academic and Professional Performance Policies section of the current UNMC Student Handbook.
                    <ol type="a" style="max-width:64em !important; ">
                        <li>Delivery Receipt with University email will serve as confirmation that the student has received this information. </li>
                    </ol>
              </li>
          </ol>
    </li>
     <li style="margin-left:3em;">The Undergraduate Academic Review Committee (UG-ARC), comprised of 10 undergraduate faculty members, will serve in accordance with the Rules & Regulations for this standing committee and in alignment with the Rules & Regulations of the Undergraduate Curriculum Committee, the Faculty Coordinating Council and General Faculty Organization.
          <ol type="i" style="max-width:67em !important; ">
              <li>A UG-ARC Chair will be chosen from the 10 undergraduate faculty of the committee at the fall biannual meeting. </li>
              <li>Previous committee experience is a preferred qualification for the UG-ARC Hearing Board Chair. </li>
          </ol>
    </li>
     <li style="margin-left:3em;">The Undergraduate Academic Review Committee (UG-ARC) Hearing Board, will be appointed 5 member subgroup from the UG-ARC assigned to a specific academic appeal, who are following the rules and the functions of the Committee for the specific student appeal and not representative of the campus involved. The UG-ARC Chair will preside over the hearing and be an non-voting member of the committee.  
          <ol type="i" style="max-width:67em !important; ">
              <li>The UG-ARC Hearing Board will decide if the hearing will be the held, or not, and have the choice to review information in closed session. </li>
          </ol>
    </li>
     <li style="margin-left:3em;">The judgements of the UG-ARC and the UG-ARC Hearing Board will be in conformity with the policies related to the UNMC College of Nursing and the Academic Appeal information for proceedings. UG-ARC will also consider and support faculty’s academic freedom in relation to the course being taught. </li>
     <li style="margin-left:3em;">The judgements of the UG-ARC and the UG-ARC Hearing Board will be in conformity with the policies related to the UNMC College of Nursing and the Academic Appeal information for proceedings. UG-ARC will also consider and support faculty’s academic freedom in relation to the course being taught. </li>
     <li style="margin-left:3em;">The UG-ARC will meet “as needed/on call” in addition to biannual meetings in September and April. The Chair will direct the agenda for reporting, trending in data and policy review and updates to all responsible reviewing bodies listed above. </li>
     <li style="margin-left:3em;">The UG-ARC will meet “as needed/on call” in addition to biannual meetings in September and April. The Chair will direct the agenda for reporting, trending in data and policy review and updates to all responsible reviewing bodies listed above. </li>
     <li style="margin-left:3em;">UG-ARC Hearing Board proceedings related to student issues will be conducted as confidential proceedings. </li>
     <li style="margin-left:3em;">UG-ARC Hearing Board proceedings related to student issues will be conducted as confidential proceedings.  
          <ol type="i" style="max-width:67em !important; ">
              <li>At any time during the appeal process, the student will be entitled to examine the student’s school file and any materials which were used in determining the challenged grade. </li>
          </ol>
    </li>
     <li style="margin-left:3em;">A majority vote of the UG-ARC Hearing Board will determine the appeal outcome. </li>
     <li style="margin-left:3em;">A majority vote of the UG-ARC Hearing Board will determine the appeal outcome. </li>
     <li style="margin-left:3em;">The UG-ARC Chair will notify the student, the faculty and the Undergraduate Program Director. The Undergraduate Program Director will notify the The Division Assistant Dean, the Associate Dean of Academic Programs and the Dean. </li>
     <li style="margin-left:3em;">The UG-ARC Chair will notify the student, the faculty and the Undergraduate Program Director. The Undergraduate Program Director will notify the The Division Assistant Dean, the Associate Dean of Academic Programs and the Dean. </li>

Navigation menu