CON Procedures for Handling Undergraduate Student Appeals of Academic Evaluations: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 57: Line 57:


<br />
<br />
 
<p>This policy is currently under revision.  Please refer to the earlier version linked in the header until this work is complete.</p>
===Policy:===
===Policy:===
<p style="margin-bottom:15px;max-width:70em !important;">Paragraph 5.3 of the [http://nebraska.edu/docs/board/bylaws.pdf Bylaws of the Board of Regents] provides in part as follows: Each college or school shall provide for a faculty-student appeals committee for students who believe that evaluation of their academic progress has been prejudiced or capricious. Such procedure shall provide for changing of student's evaluation upon the committee's finding that an academic evaluation by a member of a faculty has been improper. See also UNMC College of Nursing Policies: [[CON Academic Review Committee Rules of the Faculty Organization|4.1.6 Academic Review Committee]] and [[CON Undergraduate Student Grade Appeal|5.2.19 Undergraduate Student Grade Appeal]].</p>
<p style="margin-bottom:15px;max-width:70em !important;">Paragraph 5.3 of the [http://nebraska.edu/docs/board/bylaws.pdf Bylaws of the Board of Regents] provides in part as follows: Each college or school shall provide for a faculty-student appeals committee for students who believe that evaluation of their academic progress has been prejudiced or capricious. Such procedure shall provide for changing of student's evaluation upon the committee's finding that an academic evaluation by a member of a faculty has been improper. See also UNMC College of Nursing Policies: [[CON Academic Review Committee Rules of the Faculty Organization|4.1.6 Academic Review Committee]] and [[CON Undergraduate Student Grade Appeal|5.2.19 Undergraduate Student Grade Appeal]].</p>

Navigation menu