CON Procedures for Handling Undergraduate Student Appeals of Academic Evaluations: Difference between revisions

CON Procedures for Handling Undergraduate Student Appeals of Academic Evaluations (view source)

792 bytes added , August 5, 2022

9,138

edits

@@ Line 72: / Line 72: @@
 ====Procedure Steps:====
 <ol style="max-width:67em !important;">
-     <li style="margin-bottom:15px;">O</li>
+     <li style="margin-bottom:15px;">Course Faculty/ Coordinator receives notice from the student immediately after receiving the grade alleged to be capricious or prejudiced, that the student wants to informally discuss the grade. </li>
-     <li style="margin-bottom:15px;">O</li>
+     <li style="margin-bottom:15px;">Faculty and student meet to discuss the grading with the student presenting the information regarding why the grading is believed to be capricious and or prejudiced.
-     <li style="margin-bottom:15px;">O</li>
+          <ol type="a" style="max-width:67em !important;">
+               <li>If a satisfactory agreement cannot be made, the student may appeal in writing to the Undergraduate Academic Review Committee (UG-ARC) chair. </li>
+          </ol>
+    </li>
+     <li style="margin-bottom:15px;">The student may request to meet informally to discuss the appeal with the program director in which the course is offered after meeting with the faculty member involved/course coordinator.</li>
      <li style="margin-bottom:15px;">O</li>
      <li style="margin-bottom:15px;">O</li>
      <li style="margin-bottom:15px;">O</li>
 </ol>