CON Faculty Evaluation: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search

CON Faculty Evaluation (view source)

Revision as of 16:19, June 25, 2024

126 bytes added ,  June 25
→‎Policy
VisualWikitext
Line 84: Line 84:
     </ul>
     </ul>
     </li>
     </li>
     <li style="margin-bottom:15px;"></li>
     <li style="margin-bottom:15px;">To prepare for an annual evaluation, faculty members submit to designated supervisor the following:
     <li style="margin-bottom:15px;"></li>
    <ul style="margin-bottom:15px;max-width:67em !important;">
     <li style="margin-bottom:15px;"></li>
        <li>annual faculty activity review form which includes assessment of previous year’s goals and plans for current year’s goals.</li>
     <li style="margin-bottom:15px;"></li>
        <li>supporting documentation (e.g., UNMC Interprofessional Academy of Educators (IAE) Peer Feedback on Teaching for Health Professions Lectures Form and actionable ideas to implement, student evaluations).</li>
        <li>updated curriculum vita (CV) using the UNMC approved format, including continuing education listings and credits. Activities for the year under review shall be highlighted.</li>
    </ul>
    </li>
    <li style="margin-bottom:15px;">Faculty members shall make an appointment with their supervisor for the review after their fully completed materials listed above are submitted to the supervisor.</li>
    <li style="margin-bottom:15px;">The supervisor shall review the documents and provide performance ratings of the faculty member’s performance relative to each tripartite mission role function. The supervisor also provides a brief narrative evaluation summary.</li>
    <li style="margin-bottom:15px;">The faculty member, designated supervisor, and/or the Associate Dean for Research and/or the Associate Dean for Transformational Practice and Partnerships as appropriate shall meet to discuss the evaluative materials and set goals for the next academic year as well as plans for achieving the goals. In collaboration with their designated administrator, faculty members develop annual goals that are congruent with the CON standards for Promotion and Tenure (4.4.6(1), 4.4.6(2), Appendix A1, Appendix A2), the tripartite mission, and, as appropriate, with the strategic plan.</li>
    <li style="margin-bottom:15px;">Designated supervisors shall provide faculty members guidance on how to improve in areas which have been identified for growth.</li>
    <li style="margin-bottom:15px;">The final written evaluation shall be dated and signed by the faculty member and designated supervisor.</li>
     <li style="margin-bottom:15px;">A faculty member has the opportunity to respond in writing to the evaluation. </li>
     <li style="margin-bottom:15px;">After the meeting, the designated supervisor shall provide a copy of the signed evaluation materials to the faculty member and place the original documents in the faculty member's permanent file in the dean’s office.</li>
     <li style="margin-bottom:15px;">Evaluation records are confidential. Designated supervisors have access to files of faculty whom they supervise. The dean has access to all faculty files. Faculty evaluations are kept in the official personnel file. Faculty also have access to their personnel files at any time. </li>
</ol>
</ol>
<p style="margin-bottom:15px;max-width:70em !important;">The designated administrators orient newly hired faculty to evaluation policies, procedures and forms at the time of employment.</p>
<p style="margin-bottom:15px;max-width:70em !important;">All faculty are evaluated at least annually by their Division Assistant Dean or appropriate administrator. The administrators make merit recommendations with rationale, including a completed performance appraisal, to the dean.</p>
<p style="margin-bottom:15px;max-width:70em !important;">Multiple sources of data are used for faculty evaluations. At a minimum, annual evaluations are based on faculty self-evaluation, student evaluations, and designated administrator evaluation. Other data, such as peer evaluation or evaluation by outside consultants, can be sought at the discretion of the designated administrator and/or the faculty. New faculty members are evaluated at the end of their first term of teaching, as well as the end of the year; the first evaluation is typically formative and focuses on mentoring and counseling.</p>
<p style="margin-bottom:15px;max-width:70em !important;">To prepare for an annual evaluation, faculty members submit to designated administrator the following: 1) annual faculty self-evaluation form, 2) student evaluations and 3) updated curriculum vita (CV).</p>
<p style="margin-bottom:15px;max-width:70em !important;">Evaluation records are confidential. Designated administrators have access to files of faculty whom they supervise. The dean has access to all faculty files. Faculty evaluations are kept in the official personnel file. Faculty also have access to their personnel files at any time.</p>
<p style="margin-bottom:15px;max-width:70em !important;">Graduate or Teaching Assistants (GA or TA), whether teaching or performing other College of Nursing work such as research or practice, also are evaluated annually by their designated administrator or other appropriate supervisor. If appropriate, student evaluations are submitted to be considered in the evaluation.</p>
<!--
<p style="margin-bottom:15px;max-width:70em !important;">For regular faculty (non-GA personnel), Division Assistant Deans make merit raise recommendations with rationale, including a completed performance appraisal, to the Dean.</p>
<p style="margin-bottom:15px;max-width:70em !important;">Evaluation records are confidential. Division Assistant Deans have access to files of faculty whom they supervise. The Dean has access to all faculty files. Faculty evaluations are kept in the official personnel file.</p>
-->


===Procedures===
===Procedures===
Retrieved from "https://wiki.unmc.edu/index.php/Special:MobileDiff/16026"

Navigation menu