658
edits
UNMC AI Use Guidelines: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
no edit summary
Mhurlocker (talk | contribs) |
Mhurlocker (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
Policy No.: '''8020''' | Policy No.: '''8020''' | ||
Effective Date: | Effective Date: 03/07/2025 | ||
Revised Date: | Revised Date: 06/04/2025 | ||
Reviewed Date: | Reviewed Date: 06/04/2025 | ||
'''<big>UNMC AI Use Guidelines</big>''' | '''<big>UNMC AI Use Guidelines</big>''' | ||
| Line 51: | Line 51: | ||
4. Employees and students must maintain current awareness of ethical and responsible use of AI in research and creative activities by regularly reviewing university policies and relevant guidelines from funding agencies. | 4. Employees and students must maintain current awareness of ethical and responsible use of AI in research and creative activities by regularly reviewing university policies and relevant guidelines from funding agencies. | ||
5. Before entering into agreements with vendors, subcontractors, or collaborators, it is important to inquire about any potential use of AI. Any new solution involving AI—or any addition of AI to an existing solution—must go through the risk assessment process, as outlined in UNMC/Nebraska Medicine IM #63: Risk Assessment Policy. To ensure responsible and ethical use of AI in line with these guidelines, additional terms and conditions may be required in current or future agreements. | 5. Before entering into agreements with vendors, subcontractors, or collaborators, it is important to inquire about any potential use of AI. Any new solution involving AI—or any addition of AI to an existing solution—must go through the risk assessment process, as outlined in [https://info.unmc.edu/its-security/policies/procedures/imriskassessment.html UNMC/Nebraska Medicine IM #63: Risk Assessment Policy]. To ensure responsible and ethical use of AI in line with these guidelines, additional terms and conditions may be required in current or future agreements. | ||
6. Federal funding agencies prohibit the use of AI tools during the peer-review process. The National Institutes of Health (NIH), in its discussion of AI peer review, explains that using AI in the peer review process is a breach of confidentiality because peer review is a confidential process and these tools “have no guarantee of where data are being sent, saved, viewed or used in the future.” The National Science Foundation (NSF) shares guidelines for declaring the use of AI in proposals and explicitly prohibits the use of AI in the NSF merit review process. | 6. Federal funding agencies prohibit the use of AI tools during the peer-review process. The National Institutes of Health (NIH), in its discussion of AI peer review, explains that using AI in the peer review process is a breach of confidentiality because peer review is a confidential process and these tools “have no guarantee of where data are being sent, saved, viewed or used in the future.” The National Science Foundation (NSF) shares guidelines for declaring the use of AI in proposals and explicitly prohibits the use of AI in the NSF merit review process. | ||