11,224
edits
CON Faculty Evaluation: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
→Policy
No edit summary |
(→Policy) |
||
| Line 79: | Line 79: | ||
<li style="margin-bottom:15px;">Metrics for each mission area are delineated in categories and by level of achievement. Levels of achievement are listed for each rating level using UNMC performance ratings. Level 1 (unsatisfactory performance seldom meets established standards), Level 2 (needs improvement, sometimes meets established standards but lacks consistency), Level 3 (meets and occasionally exceeds established standards, or Level 4 (consistently meets and almost always exceeds expected levels of performance. See University of Nebraska Medical Center (UNMC) College of Nursing (CON) Faculty Annual Evaluation Form for expected outcomes for each mission’s metrics by level. | <li style="margin-bottom:15px;">Metrics for each mission area are delineated in categories and by level of achievement. Levels of achievement are listed for each rating level using UNMC performance ratings. Level 1 (unsatisfactory performance seldom meets established standards), Level 2 (needs improvement, sometimes meets established standards but lacks consistency), Level 3 (meets and occasionally exceeds established standards, or Level 4 (consistently meets and almost always exceeds expected levels of performance. See University of Nebraska Medical Center (UNMC) College of Nursing (CON) Faculty Annual Evaluation Form for expected outcomes for each mission’s metrics by level. | ||
<ul style="margin-bottom:15px;max-width:67em !important;"> | <ul style="margin-bottom:15px;max-width:67em !important;"> | ||
<li>Teaching mission metrics are included for peer feedback in the appropriate timeframe (see | <li>Teaching mission metrics are included for peer feedback in the appropriate timeframe (see Policy 1307 - Peer Feedback for Teaching Mission), education specific continuing education, and student evaluation of faculty in courses (see Policy 2105 - Student Ratings of Instruction).</li> | ||
<li>Scholarly activity mission metrics are included for grants and publications (see | <li>Scholarly activity mission metrics are included for grants and publications (see Procedure 1305-PR - Guidelines for Doctoral Prepared Faculty Role Differentiation).</li> | ||
<li>Practice mission metrics are included for practice hours, contracted agency satisfaction with faculty, continuing clinical education attendance, and dissemination of practice scholarship.</li> | <li>Practice mission metrics are included for practice hours, contracted agency satisfaction with faculty, continuing clinical education attendance, and dissemination of practice scholarship.</li> | ||
<li>Service mission metrics are included for organizational committee participation and professional organization participation.</li> | <li>Service mission metrics are included for organizational committee participation and professional organization participation.</li> | ||
| Line 95: | Line 95: | ||
<li style="margin-bottom:15px;">Faculty members shall make an appointment with their supervisor for the review after their fully completed materials listed above are submitted to the supervisor.</li> | <li style="margin-bottom:15px;">Faculty members shall make an appointment with their supervisor for the review after their fully completed materials listed above are submitted to the supervisor.</li> | ||
<li style="margin-bottom:15px;">The supervisor shall review the documents and provide performance ratings of the faculty member’s performance relative to each tripartite mission role function. The supervisor also provides a brief narrative evaluation summary.</li> | <li style="margin-bottom:15px;">The supervisor shall review the documents and provide performance ratings of the faculty member’s performance relative to each tripartite mission role function. The supervisor also provides a brief narrative evaluation summary.</li> | ||
<li style="margin-bottom:15px;">The faculty member, designated supervisor, and/or the Associate Dean for Research and/or the Associate Dean for Transformational Practice and Partnerships as appropriate shall meet to discuss the evaluative materials and set goals for the next academic year as well as plans for achieving the goals. In collaboration with their designated administrator, faculty members develop annual goals that are congruent with the CON standards for Promotion and Tenure ( | <li style="margin-bottom:15px;">The faculty member, designated supervisor, and/or the Associate Dean for Research and/or the Associate Dean for Transformational Practice and Partnerships as appropriate shall meet to discuss the evaluative materials and set goals for the next academic year as well as plans for achieving the goals. In collaboration with their designated administrator, faculty members develop annual goals that are congruent with the CON standards for Promotion and Tenure (Policy 1601, Policy 1602, Procedure 1601-PR1, Procedure 1602-PR), the tripartite mission, and, as appropriate, with the strategic plan.</li> | ||
<li style="margin-bottom:15px;">Designated supervisors shall provide faculty members guidance on how to improve in areas which have been identified for growth.</li> | <li style="margin-bottom:15px;">Designated supervisors shall provide faculty members guidance on how to improve in areas which have been identified for growth.</li> | ||
<li style="margin-bottom:15px;">The final written evaluation shall be dated and signed by the faculty member and designated supervisor.</li> | <li style="margin-bottom:15px;">The final written evaluation shall be dated and signed by the faculty member and designated supervisor.</li> | ||