CON Procedures for Handling Undergraduate Student Appeals of Academic Evaluations: Difference between revisions

CON Procedures for Handling Undergraduate Student Appeals of Academic Evaluations (view source)

1 byte added , August 7, 2013

1,619

edits

@@ Line 69: / Line 69: @@
 <p style="margin-bottom:15px;">The committee shall not have jurisdiction over appeals by students where disciplinary action is proposed because of violation of law or of university rules or regulations, disruptive or insubordinate behavior, or academic dishonesty such as cheating or plagiarism. Such matters are the jurisdiction of the college or schools student discipline hearing board.</p>
-<p style="margin-bottom:15px;">In any matter involving an appeal by a student, neither the Dean of the college or school nor the instructor whose grade or evaluation is being questioned nor the chair/assistant dean of the department/division involved shall serve on the committee. The Dean shall designate temporary replacement on the committee if necessary. Questions of procedure by either the student or faculty may be referred to the Undergraduate programdirector.</p>
+<p style="margin-bottom:15px;">In any matter involving an appeal by a student, neither the Dean of the college or school nor the instructor whose grade or evaluation is being questioned nor the chair/assistant dean of the department/division involved shall serve on the committee. The Dean shall designate temporary replacement on the committee if necessary. Questions of procedure by either the student or faculty may be referred to the Undergraduate program director.</p>
 <p style="margin-bottom:15px;">'''Appeal of Academic Evaluation'''<br />