9,235
edits
CON Faculty Evaluation: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
→Policy
(→Policy) |
(→Policy) |
||
| Line 56: | Line 56: | ||
<br /> | <br /> | ||
===Policy=== | ===Policy=== | ||
All faculty are evaluated at least annually by their Chair/Division Assistant Dean. | <p style="margin-bottom:15px;">All faculty are evaluated at least annually by their Chair/Division Assistant Dean.</p> | ||
<p style="margin-bottom:15px;">Multiple sources of data are used for faculty evaluations. At a minimum, annual evaluations are based on faculty self evaluation, student evaluation, and Chair/Division Assistant Dean evaluation. Other data, such as peer evaluation or evaluation by outside consultants, can be sought at the discretion of the Chair/Division Assistant Dean and/or the faculty.</p> | |||
Multiple sources of data are used for faculty evaluations. At a minimum, annual evaluations are based on faculty self evaluation, student evaluation, and Chair/Division Assistant Dean evaluation. Other data, such as peer evaluation or evaluation by outside consultants, can be sought at the discretion of the Chair/Division Assistant Dean and/or the faculty. | |||
To prepare for an annual evaluation, faculty members submit to Chair/Division Assistant Deans the following: 1) self evaluation; 2) student/course evaluations; 3) proposed future activity goals 4) updated C.V. | To prepare for an annual evaluation, faculty members submit to Chair/Division Assistant Deans the following: 1) self evaluation; 2) student/course evaluations; 3) proposed future activity goals 4) updated C.V. | ||