9,879
edits
CON Faculty Evaluation: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
→Annual Evaluation Meeting:
| Line 67: | Line 67: | ||
====Annual Evaluation Meeting:==== | ====Annual Evaluation Meeting:==== | ||
<ol style="margin-bottom:15px;"> | <ol style="margin-bottom:15px;"> | ||
<li style="margin-bottom:15px;"></li> | <li style="margin-bottom:15px;">The period of evaluation typically is from March of the previous year to March of the current year in line with an approximately 12-month period.</li> | ||
<li style="margin-bottom:15px;"></li> | <li style="margin-bottom:15px;">The Chair/Division Assistant Deans orient newly-hired faculty to evaluation policies, procedures and forms at the time of their employment.</li> | ||
<li style="margin-bottom:15px;"></li> | <li style="margin-bottom:15px;">An annual evaluation meeting is held between the faculty member and the Chair/Division Assistant Dean for the purpose of discussing and completing the evaluation. </li> | ||
<li style="margin-bottom:15px;"></li> | <li style="margin-bottom:15px;">The faculty member contacts the Chair/Division Assistant Dean’s support staff to schedule a time for the evaluation meeting.</li> | ||
<li style="margin-bottom:15px;"></li> | <li style="margin-bottom:15px;">In advance of the meeting, the faculty member completes the Annual Faculty Activity Review form (and attaches copies of all course/student evaluations and an updated CV); collects and supplies any other documents the faculty desires to be included in the evaluation (e.g., peer evaluations, other documentation); and emails the packet to his/her Chair/Division Assistant Dean, who will consider the material and provide numeric ratings of the faculty member’s performance relative to each role function and a brief narrative evaluation summary. </li> | ||
<li style="margin-bottom:15px;"></li> | <li style="margin-bottom:15px;">The faculty member and Chair/Division Assistant Dean meet and discuss the evaluative materials presented in the Annual Faculty Activity Review form and set goals for the next academic year as well as plans for achieving the goals. In collaboration with their Chair/Division Assistant Dean, faculty members develop annual goals that are congruent with the CON strategic plan, and, as appropriate, consistent with plans for promotion and tenure (See Appendix A, Standards for Promotion and Tenure).</li> | ||
<li style="margin-bottom:15px;"></li> | <li style="margin-bottom:15px;">Chair/Division Assistant Deans provide faculty members guidance to improve in areas which have been identified as deficient or needing improvement.</li> | ||
<li style="margin-bottom:15px;"></li> | <li style="margin-bottom:15px;">The final written evaluation is dated and signed by the faculty member and Chair/Division Assistant Dean.</li> | ||
<li style="margin-bottom:15px;"></li> | <li style="margin-bottom:15px;">Faculty members have the opportunity to respond in writing to their evaluation. </li> | ||
<li style="margin-bottom:15px;"></li> | <li style="margin-bottom:15px;">Following the meeting, the Chair/Division Assistant Dean provides a copy of the signed evaluation materials to the faculty member, and places the original documents in the faculty member's permanent file in the Dean’s Office.</li> | ||
</ol> | </ol> | ||