CON Faculty Evaluation: Difference between revisions

<p style="margin-bottom:15px;">All faculty are evaluated at least annually by their Chair/Division Assistant Dean.</p>

<p style="margin-bottom:15px;">Multiple sources of data are used for faculty evaluations. At a minimum, annual evaluations are based on faculty self evaluation, student evaluation, and Chair/Division Assistant Dean evaluation. Other data, such as peer evaluation or evaluation by outside consultants, can be sought at the discretion of the Chair/Division Assistant Dean and/or the faculty.</p>

<p style="margin-bottom:15px;">To prepare for an annual evaluation, faculty members submit to Chair/Division Assistant Deans the following: 1) self evaluation; 2) student/course evaluations; 3) proposed future activity goals 4) updated C.V.</p>

<p style="margin-bottom:15px;">Graduate Assistants (GA), whether teaching or performing other College of Nursing work such as research or practice, also are evaluated annually by their Chair/Division Assistant Dean or other appropriate supervisor. If appropriate, student evaluations are submitted to the Chair/Division Assistant Dean to be considered in the evaluation.</p>

<p style="margin-bottom:15px;">For regular faculty (non-GA personnel), Chair/Division Assistant Deans make merit raise recommendations with rationale, including a completed performance appraisal, to the Dean.</p>

<p style="margin-bottom:15px;">Evaluation records are confidential. Chair/Division Assistant Deans have access to files of faculty whom they supervise. The Dean has access to all faculty files. Faculty evaluations are kept in the official personnel file.</p>