9,879
edits
CON Faculty Evaluation: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
→Peer Evaluation of Faculty
| Line 103: | Line 103: | ||
<li style="margin-left:3em; margin-bottom:15px;">Allow for promotion and tenure or triggered post-tenure review. <sup>1</sup></li> | <li style="margin-left:3em; margin-bottom:15px;">Allow for promotion and tenure or triggered post-tenure review. <sup>1</sup></li> | ||
</ol> | </ol> | ||
<ol style="margin-bottom:15px;"> | <ol style="margin-bottom:15px;max-width:70em !important;"> | ||
<li style="margin-bottom:15px;">A faculty member and/or faculty Division Assistant Dean may request that a peer or peers evaluate the faculty’s role performance as part of an annual evaluation process, a requested review to improve role performance and/or as part of a special administrative review. </li> | <li style="margin-bottom:15px;">A faculty member and/or faculty Division Assistant Dean may request that a peer or peers evaluate the faculty’s role performance as part of an annual evaluation process, a requested review to improve role performance and/or as part of a special administrative review. </li> | ||
<li style="margin-bottom:15px;">Peer reviewer(s) may be selected by the faculty and/or faculty Division Assistant Dean. Peer reviewer(s) should be knowledgeable about the role(s) to be evaluated. </li> | <li style="margin-bottom:15px;">Peer reviewer(s) may be selected by the faculty and/or faculty Division Assistant Dean. Peer reviewer(s) should be knowledgeable about the role(s) to be evaluated. </li> | ||