CON Faculty Evaluation: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 103: Line 103:
     <li style="margin-left:3em; margin-bottom:15px;">Allow for promotion and tenure or triggered post-tenure review.  <sup>1</sup></li>
     <li style="margin-left:3em; margin-bottom:15px;">Allow for promotion and tenure or triggered post-tenure review.  <sup>1</sup></li>
</ol>
</ol>
<ol style="margin-bottom:15px;">
<ol style="margin-bottom:15px;max-width:70em !important;">
     <li style="margin-bottom:15px;">A faculty member and/or faculty Division Assistant Dean may request that a peer or peers evaluate the faculty’s role performance as part of an annual evaluation process, a requested review to improve role performance and/or as part of a special administrative review. </li>
     <li style="margin-bottom:15px;">A faculty member and/or faculty Division Assistant Dean may request that a peer or peers evaluate the faculty’s role performance as part of an annual evaluation process, a requested review to improve role performance and/or as part of a special administrative review. </li>
     <li style="margin-bottom:15px;">Peer reviewer(s) may be selected by the faculty and/or faculty Division Assistant Dean.  Peer reviewer(s) should be knowledgeable about the role(s) to be evaluated. </li>
     <li style="margin-bottom:15px;">Peer reviewer(s) may be selected by the faculty and/or faculty Division Assistant Dean.  Peer reviewer(s) should be knowledgeable about the role(s) to be evaluated. </li>

Navigation menu