CON Procedures for Handling Undergraduate Student Appeals of Academic Evaluations: Difference between revisions

<p style="margin-bottom:15px;max-width:70em !important;">Students desiring to appeal a grade or an evaluation of their academic progress, not involving academic dismissal or suspension, shall proceed as follows:</p>

     <li style="margin-bottom:15px;">A student who believes that his/her grade or evaluation is the result of prejudice or caprice or is otherwise improper shall first discuss the matter directly with the instructor involved. If the student and instructor do not reach a satisfactory agreement, the student may appeal either orally or in writing to the department chair/division assistant dean in which the course is offered. If the student and chair/assistant dean do not reach a satisfactory agreement, the student may submit within two weeks following reporting or posting of the grade or evaluation in question, an appeal in writing to the chair of the Academic Review Committee. If the student finds it impossible to complete discussions with the course instructor and department chair/division assistant dean within the two-week period, he/she should notify the chair of the Academic Review Committee of the need for additional time, and the chair shall extend the appeal period by an appropriate number of days.</li>

     <li style="margin-bottom:15px;">The written appeal submitted to the chair of the committee should provide an account of the facts pertinent to the awarding of the grade and the reasons why the student believes the grade or evaluation to be the result of prejudice or caprice or otherwise improper. The student should be as specific as possible. If the student wishes to appear personally before the committee, he or she should include a statement to the effect. The committee may, but shall not be required to, grant such a request.</li>