9,102
edits
CON Faculty Evaluation: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
→Annual Evaluation Meeting:
(→Policy) |
|||
| Line 79: | Line 79: | ||
====Annual Evaluation Meeting:==== | ====Annual Evaluation Meeting:==== | ||
<ol style="margin-bottom:15px;max-width:70em !important;"> | <ol style="margin-bottom:15px;max-width:70em !important;"> | ||
<li style="margin-bottom:15px;">The period of evaluation typically is from | <li style="margin-bottom:15px;">The period of evaluation typically is from January 1 to December 31 of the previous year in line with an approximately 12-month period.</li> | ||
<!-- | |||
<li style="margin-bottom:15px;">The Division Assistant Deans orient newly-hired faculty to evaluation policies, procedures and forms at the time of their employment.</li> | <li style="margin-bottom:15px;">The Division Assistant Deans orient newly-hired faculty to evaluation policies, procedures and forms at the time of their employment.</li> | ||
--> | |||
<li style="margin-bottom:15px;">An annual evaluation meeting is held between the faculty member and the Division Assistant Dean for the purpose of discussing and completing the evaluation. </li> | <li style="margin-bottom:15px;">An annual evaluation meeting is held between the faculty member and the Division Assistant Dean for the purpose of discussing and completing the evaluation. </li> | ||
<!-- | |||
<li style="margin-bottom:15px;">The faculty member contacts the Division Assistant Dean’s support staff to schedule a time for the evaluation meeting.</li> | <li style="margin-bottom:15px;">The faculty member contacts the Division Assistant Dean’s support staff to schedule a time for the evaluation meeting.</li> | ||
<li style="margin-bottom:15px;">In advance of the meeting, the faculty member completes the Annual Faculty | --> | ||
<li style="margin-bottom:15px;">In advance of the meeting, the faculty member completes the Annual Faculty Self-Evaluation form and updates their CV by the designated due date. The faculty member also collects and supplies any other documents to be included in the evaluation (e.g., peer evaluations, letters of support or recognition, other documentation); and emails the packet to his/her designated administrator. The administrator will consider the material and provide performance ratings of the faculty member’s performance relative to each tripartite mission role function and a brief narrative evaluation summary. </li> | |||
<li>When faculty evaluation materials are completed, the faculty member contacts the designated administrator's support staff to schedule a time to the evaluation meeting.</li> | |||
<li style="margin-bottom:15px;">The faculty member and Division Assistant Dean meet and discuss the evaluative materials presented in the Annual Faculty Activity Review form and set goals for the next academic year as well as plans for achieving the goals. In collaboration with their Division Assistant Dean, faculty members develop annual goals that are congruent with the CON strategic plan, and, as appropriate, consistent with plans for promotion and tenure (See Appendix A, Standards for Promotion and Tenure).</li> | <li style="margin-bottom:15px;">The faculty member and Division Assistant Dean meet and discuss the evaluative materials presented in the Annual Faculty Activity Review form and set goals for the next academic year as well as plans for achieving the goals. In collaboration with their Division Assistant Dean, faculty members develop annual goals that are congruent with the CON strategic plan, and, as appropriate, consistent with plans for promotion and tenure (See Appendix A, Standards for Promotion and Tenure).</li> | ||
<li style="margin-bottom:15px;">Division Assistant Deans provide faculty members guidance to improve in areas which have been identified as deficient or needing improvement.</li> | <li style="margin-bottom:15px;">Division Assistant Deans provide faculty members guidance to improve in areas which have been identified as deficient or needing improvement.</li> | ||