CON Faculty Evaluation: Difference between revisions

CON Faculty Evaluation (view source)

740 bytes removed , Tuesday at 16:57

9,530

edits

@@ Line 68: / Line 68: @@
 <p style="margin-bottom:15px;max-width:70em !important;">This policy applies to all faculty.</p>
 ===Policy===
-<p style="margin-bottom:15px;max-width:70em !important;">The purposes of faculty evaluation are the following:</p>
-<ul style="margin-bottom:15px;max-width:67em !important;">
-<li style="margin-bottom:15px;">Review contributions to the tripartite mission: a) teaching, b) scholarship/research and c) service/practice</li>
-<li style="margin-bottom:15px;">Review/assist faculty development, including career advancement such as promotion and recognition</li>
-<li style="margin-bottom:15px;">Identify goals and strengths of individual faculty to better match the university mission</li>
-<li style="margin-bottom:15px;">Identify plans for growth (mentoring) and/or improvement</li>
-<li>Provide for an annual review of goal achievement</li>
-</ul>
 <p style="margin-bottom:15px;max-width:70em !important;">The designated administrators orient newly hired faculty to evaluation policies, procedures and forms at the time of employment.</p>
 <p style="margin-bottom:15px;max-width:70em !important;">All faculty are evaluated at least annually by their Division Assistant Dean or appropriate administrator. The administrators make merit recommendations with rationale, including a completed performance appraisal, to the dean.</p>