CON Guidelines For Suspected Breach of Professional Behavior: Difference between revisions

CON Guidelines For Suspected Breach of Professional Behavior (view source)

Revision as of 16:31, November 29, 2021

755 bytes added , November 29, 2021

→‎Procedure for the Hearing:

VisualWikitext

Emrivera

Administrators

157

edits

@@ Line 243: / Line 243: @@
 <ol style="max-width:67em  margin-bottom:15px;">
-<li>The CON Hearing Officer must conduct the hearing in a manner that facilitates the presentation of relevant evidence and in accordance with the UNMC Student Code of Conduct.  (link here again) </li>
+<li>The CON Hearing Officer must conduct the hearing in a manner that facilitates the presentation of relevant evidence and in accordance with the [https://catalog.unmc.edu/general-information/student-policies-procedures/code-of-conduct/ UNMC Student Code of Conduct]. </li>
 <ol style="max-width:67em !important;list-style-type: lower-alpha; margin-bottom:15px;">
 <li>The Hearing Officer has the discretion to allow the use of a question-and-answer format or allow a witness to make an oral statement about what the witness knows about the matter. </li>
@@ Line 275: / Line 275: @@
 </ol>
+<li>The student will have 10 University days to respond to the CON DHB final decision via University email to the CON Conduct Officer.</li>
+<li>If no written response from the student is received during this timeframe, the DHB decision will be considered final.</li>
+<li>If the student’s written response is debating the decision of the DHB, the student will be directed to the procedures to follow in the appeal to the Vice Chancellor or his/her designee.</li>
+<li>If the faculty member bringing forward the charge is debating the decision of the DHB, the faculty member will be directed to the procedures to follow in the appeal to the Vice Chancellor or his/her designee.</li>
 </ol>