CON Faculty Evaluation: Difference between revisions

Line 95: Line 95:


====Peer Evaluation of Faculty====
====Peer Evaluation of Faculty====
<p style="margin-bottom:15px;">The purpose of peer review of the faculty is to:</p>
<ol style="list-style-type: lower-alpha;">
    <li style="margin-left:3em; margin-bottom:15px;">Afford faculty an evaluation from a peer or peers on role performance for continuous improvement.</li>
    <li style="margin-left:3em; margin-bottom:15px;">Provide data from peers for administrative evaluation of faculty, including the annual evaluation.</li>
    <li style="margin-left:3em; margin-bottom:15px;">Allow for promotion and tenure or triggered post-tenure review.  <sup>1</sup></li>
</ol>
<ol style="margin-bottom:15px;">
<ol style="margin-bottom:15px;">
     <li style="margin-bottom:15px;"></li>
     <li style="margin-bottom:15px;">A faculty member and/or faculty Chair/Division Assistant Dean may request that a peer or peers evaluate the faculty’s role performance as part of an annual evaluation process, a requested review to improve role performance and/or as part of a special administrative review. </li>
     <li style="margin-bottom:15px;"></li>
     <li style="margin-bottom:15px;">Peer reviewer(s) may be selected by the faculty and/or faculty Chair/Division Assistant Dean.  Peer reviewer(s) should be knowledgeable about the role(s) to be evaluated. </li>
     <li style="margin-bottom:15px;"></li>
     <li style="margin-bottom:15px;">The faculty and/or administrative evaluator make arrangements with the peer reviewer(s) on where, when and what is to be evaluated within a specified time frame. Faculty and/or the Chair/Division Assistant Dean supply needed materials to the peer reviewer.</li>
     <li style="margin-bottom:15px;"></li>
     <li style="margin-bottom:15px;">The peer reviewer forwards the written peer evaluation to the faculty’s Chair/Division Assistant Dean.</li>
     <li style="margin-bottom:15px;"></li>
     <li style="margin-bottom:15px;">The Chair/Division Assistant Dean discusses the peer review evaluation with the faculty to identify areas for improvement. </li>
</ol>
</ol>