CON Faculty Evaluation: Difference between revisions

     <li style="margin-bottom:15px;">A faculty member and/or faculty Chair/Division Assistant Dean may request that a peer or peers evaluate the faculty’s role performance as part of an annual evaluation process, a requested review to improve role performance and/or as part of a special administrative review. </li>

     <li style="margin-bottom:15px;">Peer reviewer(s) may be selected by the faculty and/or faculty Chair/Division Assistant Dean.  Peer reviewer(s) should be knowledgeable about the role(s) to be evaluated. </li>

     <li style="margin-bottom:15px;">The faculty and/or administrative evaluator make arrangements with the peer reviewer(s) on where, when and what is to be evaluated within a specified time frame. Faculty and/or the Chair/Division Assistant Dean supply needed materials to the peer reviewer.</li>

     <li style="margin-bottom:15px;">The peer reviewer forwards the written peer evaluation to the faculty’s Chair/Division Assistant Dean.</li>

     <li style="margin-bottom:15px;">The Chair/Division Assistant Dean discusses the peer review evaluation with the faculty to identify areas for improvement. </li>