|
|
Line 228: |
Line 228: |
| </ol> | | </ol> |
| <p style="margin-bottom:15px;max-width:70em !important;">Student advising is considered part of a faculty member’s service. Similarly, independent study courses are considered part of service because such courses do not meet the minimum class sizes for regular courses and are highly variable depending upon negotiated agreements between faculty and students. Faculty effort allocation may be negotiated if an independent study course results from providing a course needed by a small number of students to meet program requirements.</p> | | <p style="margin-bottom:15px;max-width:70em !important;">Student advising is considered part of a faculty member’s service. Similarly, independent study courses are considered part of service because such courses do not meet the minimum class sizes for regular courses and are highly variable depending upon negotiated agreements between faculty and students. Faculty effort allocation may be negotiated if an independent study course results from providing a course needed by a small number of students to meet program requirements.</p> |
| | ====3.2 FTE for Clinical Teaching==== |
| | ====3.2.1 FTE for face-to-face clinical supervision==== |
| | <p style="max-width:70em !important;">FTE’s are assigned 0.10 FTE per credit hour for face-to-face clinical supervision. Thus, a 3-credit hour direct clinical supervision course would receive 30% or 0.3 FTE (180 clock |
| | hours). A single section in face-to-face clinical is considered to be a group of 8-10 students. |
| | Time spent in simulations and skills labs is included in the FTE allocated for the clinical. Health |
| | assessment lab clinical supervision is assigned 0.10 per credit hour for 14-16 students.</p> |
|
| |
|
| <p><span style="text-decoration:underline;">FTE for face-to-face clinical supervision</span> (includes time spent in making assignments, pre- and post-conferences, evaluation, planning, etc.)</p> | | <p>3.2.2 FTE for Dedicated Education Unit supervision</p> |
| <p style="max-width:70em !important;">FTE are assigned based on credit hours. Thus, a 3 credit hour direct clinical supervision course would receive 30% or .3 FTE. A single section is considered to be a group of 8-10 students. Simulations are considered direct clinical supervision courses.</p> | | <p style="max-width:70em !important;">FTE’s are assigned at 0.10 per credit hour for DEU clinical supervision. Thus a 3- credit hour DEU clinical model would receive 30% or 0.30 FTE (180 clock hours). A single section is considered to be a group of 14-16 students.</p> |
| | | ====3.2.3 FTE for preceptor clinical supervision==== |
| <p><span style="text-decoration:underline;">FTE for Dedicated Education Unit supervision</span></p>
| | <p style="margin-bottom:15px;max-width:70em !important;">FTE are assigned at 0.10 FTE per 180 hours of precepted clinical hours. A single section is considered a group of 10 students at the undergraduate level.</p> |
| <p style="max-width:70em !important;">FTE’s are assigned at 10% per credit hour for DEU supervision. As an example, a 3 credit clinical course would receive 30% faculty effort allocation for supervision of 14-16 students.</p>
| | <p style="margin-bottom:15px;max-width:70em !important;">For APRN clinical assignments, faculty effort is 0.10 per semester (60 clock hours per semester). A single section is considered to be a group of 6-8 students.</p> |
| | | <p style="margin-bottom:15px;max-width:70em !important;">FTE allocations for clinical assignments include skills labs, course simulations, and Objective Structured Clinical Exams (OSCEs) for all programs.</p> |
| <p><span style="text-decoration:underline;">FTE for preceptored clinical supervision </span> (includes organizing, coordinating, mentoring, scheduling, evaluation, planning the clinical, and OSCEs):</p>
| |
| <p style="margin-bottom:15px;max-width:70em !important;">FTE are assigned slightly less than face-to-face clinical supervision, with 3 credits of precepted clinical supervision equal to .10 FTE. A clinical coordinator for a course with multiple sections may receive .10 FTE.</p> | |
| <p style="margin-bottom:15px;max-width:70em !important;">For APRN clinical credit assignments, faculty effort is calculated based on 6 students per clinical group. The faculty-student ratio will not normally exceed 1:6 for precepted clinical experiences, except in situations where faculty feel a slightly higher ratio is justified, such as for more advanced students where a 1:8 ratio might be considered.</p> | |
| | |
| <p><span style="text-decoration:underline;">SERVICE EFFORT CALCULATIONS</span></p>
| |
| <p style="max-width:70em !important;">Faculty at the CON are expected to be involved in service-related activities that benefit the CON, UNMC, or the profession. Faculty members are allocated 10-20% effort for service. An exception to this policy is made for new Assistant Professors who are research productive.</p>
| |
| | |
| <p><span style="text-decoration:underline;">PRACTICE WORKLOAD CALCULATIONS</span></p>
| |
| <p style="max-width:70em !important;">Practice is considered with professional service in the Promotion and Tenure Guidelines. The CON supports all types of faculty practice for purposes of teaching, maintaining credentialing and scholarship. The most desired models of practice are CON reimbursed practice, as this provides the opportunity for practice time to contribute to the resources of the CON and engages faculty fully in practices addressing the full range of reimbursement and billing issues. A faculty practice of one day per week is allocated 20% time per semester. If additional time is needed for documentation, on-call, or care coordination, that is included in the negotiations with the practice agency so the time is reimbursed. Faculty have the privilege of engaging in outside work up to 16 hours per month according to the Board of Regents bylaws (Outside Employment Policy #1049). Such work is outside the faculty effort allocation guidelines, but per university policy, it is expected that faculty members complete the Outside Employment Form and submit it to their supervisor.</p>
| |
| | |
| <!-- *************************************** -->
| |
| <p><span style="text-decoration:underline;">SCHOLARSHIP EFFORT</span></p>
| |
| <p style="margin-bottom:15px;max-width:70em !important;">Scholarship is defined broadly in the College of Nursing, using Boyer’s model as the framework for the types of scholarship that contribute to achieving the College’s mission. Thus, scholarship includes the scholarship of discovery, dissemination, application, and integration. An ongoing record of research and scholarship (external dissemination of project results, writing grants and manuscripts) is required of active research faculty to attain tenure. Active research faculty generally may be allocated 40% FTE to engage in scholarship activities which will be negotiated annually based on productivity. Faculty focused on the scholarship of dissemination, application, and integration also are expected to advance understanding of these areas through original, creative work. Faculty are responsible for seeking and bringing in funding to support their scholarship. Tangible outcomes, such as funded grants and contracts and publications, are considered examples of productivity. It is an expectation that faculty with active programs of scholarship will establish annual goals with specific outcomes for their continued FTE effort. After the first three years of employment, faculty members who are research active are expected to have research time reimbursed by grant funding, or to negotiate with their assistant dean if they need time to write grant proposals.</p>
| |
| <p style="margin-bottom:15px;max-width:70em !important;">Faculty members with funded grants may have their teaching or service assignments further reduced commensurate with funded grant responsibilities, although this depends on productivity and work that is planned and needed. To illustrate, a faculty member with a 25% effort funded by a research grant will be allocated 25% of his or her 100% work assignment for the grant. He or she may negotiate for a reduction in teaching or service load to supplement the time funded by the grant, depending on needs related to the grant and College needs related to teaching effort. Any additional reduction in teaching or service will end when the grant funding ends.</p>
| |
| <p style="margin-bottom:15px;max-width:70em !important;">Doctorally-prepared faculty, not wishing to participate in scholarship activities or not meeting their expected scholarship goals, will allocate their effort to the teaching and/or practice missions commensurate with the FTE effort that had been allocated.</p>
| |
| <p style="margin-bottom:15px;max-width:70em !important;">New PhD Faculty coming in at the rank of Assistant Professor will be given a reduced teaching assignment (e.g. additional 20% FTE reduced assignment) for the first three years depending on available budgetary resources with the expectation of yearly progress towards funding and publications.</p> | |
| <br />
| |
| <hr />
| |
| <p><sup>i</sup> <small>Boyer, E. (1991). <em>Scholarship Reconsidered</em>: Priorities of the Professoriate. Princeton, NJ: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching and Learning.</small></p>
| |